pcmag.com
70Score and link only; this publisher does not allow quotes.
Read the full reviewSkullcandy Rail ANC
69/ 100
Good
HearWiki score
Good value
$74
typical price, USD
Still sold newupdated 
At a glance
- Brand
- Skullcandy
- Type
- True Wireless
- Fit
- -
- Connection
- Wireless
- Noise cancelling
- Yes
- Released
- 2023
Score breakdowngood overall
Sound6.4
Noise cancelling6.7
Battery7.6
Calls6.0
Value5.8
True wireless earbuds with 4-mic digital active noise canceling, 38 hours total battery life, wireless charging case, and multipoint pairing.
The HearWiki takeAI-condensed
The Skullcandy Rail ANC earbuds deliver a bass-heavy sound profile with adaptive noise cancellation and robust app integration, making them a solid pick for budget-conscious listeners. While ANC performance is modest, they compensate with strong battery life, wireless charging, and IP55 durability. Touch controls and multipoint connectivity add everyday convenience, though the overall package doesn't top the class in any single area.
What works
- Bass-forward sound with 12mm drivers
- Adaptive ANC and transparency mode
- Long battery life: 10h (ANC off) and 27h with case
- Wireless charging and USB-C support
- IP55 water resistance and multipoint Bluetooth
What doesn't
- ANC performance is only average
- No aptX or LDAC codec support
- Touch controls may require customization for comfort
- Earbuds can feel bulky for some ears
Paraphrased from published reviews & specs - not an original hands-on test. Our AI disclosure.
Specifications
| Driver | 2× 12 mm driver |
|---|---|
| Drivers per side | 2 |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB/mW |
Audio
| Driver | 2× 12 mm driver |
|---|---|
| Drivers per side | 2 |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB/mW |
Wireless
| Bluetooth | 5.2 |
|---|---|
| Codecs | SBC, AAC |
| Multipoint pairing | Yes |
Battery
| Battery life | 10 h |
|---|---|
| Battery life (ANC on) | 7 h |
| Battery incl. case | 27 h |
| Quick charge | 10 min → 2 h |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Features
| Active noise cancelling | Yes |
|---|---|
| ANC type | adaptive |
| Transparency mode | Yes |
| Companion app | Yes |
| Custom EQ | Yes |
| Controls | touch |
Design
| Water resistance | IP55 |
|---|---|
| USB-C | Yes |
Calls
| Microphones | 4 |
|---|
Where to buy
Retailers we matched to this exact model. Prices are periodic snapshots - the link always opens the retailer's current listing.
What the reviews said
1 source(s) feeding this product's score. 1 more source(s) feed the score but are not listed, at the publisher's request.
What YouTube reviewers say
Video reviews we found, each condensed to its verdict. They do feed the HearWiki score, at a measured weight below what a published written review carries.
The consensus
Mixedacross 6 videosReviewers generally agree the Skullcandy Rail ANC earbuds offer strong value at $100, with most praising the bass-forward sound, comfortable fit, and feature-rich app, though they consistently note the noise cancelling is only average for the price.
Reviewers liked
- Bass-forward sound with good clarity
- Comfortable fit and compact design
- Feature-rich app with EQ and multipoint pairing
- Good transparency mode
- Wireless charging case
Reviewers flagged
- Average noise cancelling for the price
- No low-latency mode or in-ear detection
- Only AAC and SBC codecs, no high-res support
- Frequent connection issues reported by one reviewer
- App firmware bug can block EQ customization
9:38Skullcandy Finally Did It! : Rail ANC
8/10The reviewer was pleasantly surprised by the Skullcandy Rail ANC earbuds, which they consider the best Skullcandy earbuds to date and among the best $100 options available. They praise the powerful bass-forward sound, good transparency mode, and feature set, while noting that the noise cancelling is only average for the price. Overall, they recommend them for anyone seeking great sound on a budget.
PositiveWatch on YouTube
11:47Skullcandy Rail ANC vs Rail Earbuds: Don't Pick the Wrong Pair!
The reviewer compares the Skullcandy Rail ANC to the standard Rail earbuds, concluding that the ANC model is the better choice for most people due to its superior sound quality, active noise cancellation, and wireless charging, despite a slightly higher price and reduced water resistance. The extra $20 is deemed worth it for these upgrades, though the reviewer notes the lack of a low-latency mode and in-ear detection as minor drawbacks.
PositiveWatch on YouTube
16:15SKULLCANDY RAIL ANC + SMOKIN' BUDS // Cheapest vs priciest Skullcandy TWS throw-down
The reviewer compares the budget Skullcandy Smokin' Buds ($25) with the premium Rail ANC ($100), finding the Rail ANC offers better sound, call quality, and features like ANC and app support, but notes it's not four times better and has connection issues. The Smokin' Buds are praised for their value, comfort, and build, making them a strong budget pick despite weaker Bluetooth range and no app support.
MixedWatch on YouTube
6:05Skull Candy Air Pod Pro 2 clones??! - Rail ANC
The reviewer finds the Skullcandy Rail ANC earbuds to be a decent budget option with good noise cancellation and transparency for the price, but a major firmware update bug in the companion app prevents full EQ customization, making the sound muddy and hard to recommend. They suggest considering alternatives like the Tozo Golden X1 for a better experience.
MixedWatch on YouTube
52:12Skullcandy RAIL ANC Earbuds - Unboxing & Review
The reviewer unboxes and tests the Skullcandy Rail ANC earbuds, finding them to be a solid budget option with good comfort, a compact design, and useful app features like voice control and EQ. However, they note the lack of high-res audio codecs, average noise cancelling, and some quirks in the app and controls, leading to a mixed overall impression.
MixedWatch on YouTube
22:20Sound Challenge | Skullcandy METHOD 360 ANC Earbuds vs. Skullcandy RAIL ANC Earbuds
The reviewer compares the Skullcandy Rail ANC and Method 360 ANC earbuds in a sound challenge, finding both perform well but the Method 360 has a wider soundstage, cleaner bass with better reverb, and more depth in vocals. The Rail ANC offers clear vocals and decent bass but lacks the same level of cleanliness and low-end punch. Overall, the reviewer prefers the Method 360 for superior sound quality.
MixedWatch on YouTube
Summaries are AI condensations of each video's own conclusion, not transcripts. Titles, thumbnails and view counts belong to their channels.
Own these? Rate them.
A minute of your experience with the Skullcandy Rail ANC helps the next person shopping for them.
Alternatives in the $37–$150 range
Other true wireless models at a comparable price, ordered by HearWiki score.
More from Skullcandy
Other Skullcandy models in the database, same category first.
Where it sits in our rankings
The data-driven guides this model qualifies for.