Is the Audio-Technica ATH-S220BT worth the upgrade from the Wavefun Wave Pro X?
Verdict
Downgrade
The Audio-Technica ATH-S220BT actually scores 19.7 points below the Wavefun Wave Pro X, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on calls (7.5 to 3.3) and sound (8.5 to 6.8). Worth checking: battery life goes 100 h to 60 h and active noise cancelling goes No to No. One caution: this steps down a line tier (Wave Pro X to ATH-S220BT), and base models usually trade away tier features - check the codec and ANC rows above before trusting the score gap alone. It is at least $66 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound8.56.8
- Battery9.59.0
- Calls7.53.3
- Value9.07.8
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | Wave Pro X | ATH-S220BT | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 100 h | 60 h | |
| Active noise cancelling | No | No | |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.0 | |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No | |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz | 5 Hz - 32 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "Wave Pro X to ATH-S220BT". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.