Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Apple AirPods Pro 3 worth the upgrade from the Technics EAH-AZ40?

You haveTechnics EAH-AZ40$12968
+16.0HearWiki points
You're eyeingApple AirPods Pro 3$23284

Verdict

Clear upgrade

Going from the Technics EAH-AZ40 to the Apple AirPods Pro 3 buys you 16.0 points of HearWiki score - a clear step up that reviewers agree on rather than a marketing refresh. The gains are concentrated in sound (7.0 to 8.5), calls (7.0 to 8.5) and battery (7.0 to 8.0). On paper: bluetooth 5.2 to 5.3, driver size 6 mm to 10.7 mm and microphones 1 to 3. Worth checking: weight goes 5 g to 10.1 g and drivers per side goes 2 to 1. That costs $103 more, or about $6 per point of score - reasonable value for the jump. If your current pair is worn out or the gains line up with how you listen, this one is worth the money.

+$103
Price difference
+16.0
Score change
$6
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound7.08.5
  • Battery7.08.0
  • Calls7.08.5
  • Value7.07.5

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Technics EAH-AZ40 and the Apple AirPods Pro 3
SpecEAH-AZ40AirPods Pro 3Direction
Weight5 g10.1 g
Bluetooth5.25.3
Water resistanceIPX4IP57
Driver size6 mm10.7 mm
Drivers per side21
Microphones13
Case weight30 g43.99 g
Wireless chargingNoYes
Transparency modeNoYes
Companion appNoYes
Wear detectionNoYes
ANC typenoneadaptive
Quick charge10 min = 90 min5 minutes in case = about 1 hour listening time
Driver6mmdynamic
Frequency response20Hz-20kHz20 Hz - 20,000 Hz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the AirPods Pro 3?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "EAH-AZ40 to AirPods Pro 3". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.