Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the OnePlus Buds 3 worth the upgrade from the Technics EAH-AZ100?

You haveTechnics EAH-AZ100$25086
-11.9HearWiki points
You're eyeingOnePlus Buds 3$9874

Verdict

Downgrade

The OnePlus Buds 3 actually scores 11.9 points below the Technics EAH-AZ100, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on noise cancelling (8.6 to 6.0) and battery (8.7 to 7.0). On paper: weight 11.8 g to 4.8 g, battery incl. case 28 h to 44 h and driver size 10 mm to 11 mm. Worth checking: battery life goes 12 h to 10 h and battery life (anc on) goes 10 h to 6.5 h. It is at least $152 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

−$150
Price difference
-11.9
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.28.0
  • Noise cancelling8.66.0
  • Battery8.77.0
  • Calls7.88.0
  • Value8.18.0

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Technics EAH-AZ100 and the OnePlus Buds 3
SpecEAH-AZ100Buds 3Direction
Battery life12 h10 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, LC3, LDACSBC, AAC, LHDC
Weight11.8 g4.8 g
Water resistanceIPX4IP55
Battery life (ANC on)10 h6.5 h
Battery incl. case28 h44 h
Driver size10 mm11 mm
Drivers per side12
Microphones26
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wear detectionYesNo
Quick charge15 min → 1.2 h10 min → 7 h
Driver10 mm dynamic2-driver hybrid
Frequency response20 Hz - 40 kHz15 Hz - 40 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Buds 3?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "EAH-AZ100 to Buds 3". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.