Is the Skullcandy Crusher® ANC 2 worth the upgrade from the Sony WH-1000XM6?
Verdict
Downgrade
The Skullcandy Crusher® ANC 2 actually scores 22.1 points below the Sony WH-1000XM6, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. The gains are concentrated in battery (8.1 to 9.1). You do give up ground on noise cancelling (9.6 to 5.8) and calls (9.6 to 7.0). On paper: battery life 40 h to 60 h, battery life (anc on) 30 h to 50 h and driver size 30 mm to 40 mm. Worth checking: codecs goes SBC, AAC, LC3, LDAC to SBC, AAC and weight goes 254 g to 332 g. It is at least $161 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound9.07.2
- Noise cancelling9.65.8
- Battery8.19.1
- Calls9.67.0
- Value8.27.0
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | WH-1000XM6 | Crusher® ANC 2 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 40 h | 60 h | |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3, LDAC | SBC, AAC | |
| Weight | 254 g | 332 g | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Battery life (ANC on) | 30 h | 50 h | |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 40 mm | |
| Microphones | 12 | 4 | |
| Driver | 30 mm dynamic | 40 mm dynamic | |
| Frequency response | 4 Hz - 40 kHz | 20 Hz - 20 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "WH-1000XM6 to Crusher® ANC 2". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.