Is the Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 worth the upgrade from the Sony WF-LS900N?
Verdict
Downgrade
The Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 actually scores 19.7 points below the Sony WF-LS900N, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on sound (8.0 to 5.5) and calls (7.0 to 5.0). On paper: driver size 5 mm to 12 mm. Worth checking: battery life goes 9 h to 5 h and active noise cancelling goes Yes to No. It is at least $33 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound8.05.5
- Battery7.06.5
- Calls7.05.0
- Value8.07.0
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | WF-LS900N | Redmi Buds 3 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 9 h | 5 h | |
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No | |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3, LDAC | SBC, AAC, aptX | |
| Multipoint pairing | Yes | No | |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP54 | |
| Driver size | 5 mm | 12 mm | |
| Quick charge | 5 min → 1 h | 10 min → 1.5 h | |
| Driver | 5 mm dynamic | 12 mm dynamic |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "WF-LS900N to Redmi Buds 3". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.