Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Technics EAH-AZ60 worth the upgrade from the Sony WF-1000XM6?

You haveSony WF-1000XM6$30088
-6.0HearWiki points
You're eyeingTechnics EAH-AZ60$20082

Verdict

Downgrade

The Technics EAH-AZ60 actually scores 6.0 points below the Sony WF-1000XM6, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. The gains are concentrated in value (7.0 to 7.5). You do give up ground on battery (8.0 to 6.5) and noise cancelling (9.0 to 8.0). Worth checking: battery life goes 12 h to 7.5 h and codecs goes SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3 to SBC, AAC, LDAC. It is at least $94 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

−$94
Price difference
-6.0
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.08.5
  • Noise cancelling9.08.0
  • Battery8.06.5
  • Calls8.07.5
  • Value7.07.5

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Sony WF-1000XM6 and the Technics EAH-AZ60
SpecWF-1000XM6EAH-AZ60Direction
Battery life12 h7.5 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3SBC, AAC, LDAC
Bluetooth5.35.2
Battery life (ANC on)8 h7 h
Full charge time90 min120 min
Microphones84
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wear detectionYesNo
ANC typeadaptivehybrid
Quick charge3 min = 1 h15 min = 70 min
Driverdynamic8 mm
Frequency response20Hz-20kHz20Hz-20000Hz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the EAH-AZ60?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "WF-1000XM6 to EAH-AZ60". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.