Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro worth the upgrade from the Sony WF-1000XM6?

You haveSony WF-1000XM6$30088
-6.0HearWiki points
You're eyeingSamsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro$25082

Verdict

Downgrade

The Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro actually scores 6.0 points below the Sony WF-1000XM6, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on sound (9.0 to 7.5) and battery (8.0 to 6.5). On paper: bluetooth 5.3 to 5.4, battery incl. case 24 h to 30 h and driver size 8.4 mm to 10.5 mm. Worth checking: battery life goes 12 h to 7 h and battery life (anc on) goes 8 h to 6 h. It is at least $48 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

−$48
Price difference
-6.0
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.07.5
  • Noise cancelling9.08.0
  • Battery8.06.5
  • Calls8.07.0
  • Value7.07.0

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Sony WF-1000XM6 and the Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro
SpecWF-1000XM6Galaxy Buds3 ProDirection
Battery life12 h7 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3SBC, AAC, SSC, SSC-UHQ
Bluetooth5.35.4
Water resistanceIPX4IP57
Battery life (ANC on)8 h6 h
Battery incl. case24 h30 h
Driver size8.4 mm10.5 mm
Microphones86
Quick charge3 min = 1 h5 min = 1 h
Driverdynamic2-way speaker
Frequency response20 Hz - 40 kHz20 Hz - 20 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Galaxy Buds3 Pro?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "WF-1000XM6 to Galaxy Buds3 Pro". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.