Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Audeze Maxwell 2 worth the upgrade from the Skullcandy Crusher® ANC 2?

+21.9HearWiki points
You're eyeingAudeze Maxwell 2$33088

Verdict

Clear upgrade

Going from the Skullcandy Crusher® ANC 2 to the Audeze Maxwell 2 buys you 21.9 points of HearWiki score - a clear step up that reviewers agree on rather than a marketing refresh. The gains are concentrated in sound (7.2 to 9.5), calls (7.0 to 9.0) and value (7.0 to 7.5). On paper: battery life 60 h to 80 h, codecs SBC, AAC to SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC and bluetooth 5.2 to 5.3. Worth checking: weight goes 332 g to 560 g and battery life (anc on) goes 50 h to 35 h. That costs $92 more, or about $4 per point of score - reasonable value for the jump. If your current pair is worn out or the gains line up with how you listen, this one is worth the money.

+$92
Price difference
+21.9
Score change
$4
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound7.29.5
  • Battery9.19.5
  • Calls7.09.0
  • Value7.07.5

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Skullcandy Crusher® ANC 2 and the Audeze Maxwell 2
SpecCrusher® ANC 2Maxwell 2Direction
Battery life60 h80 h
CodecsSBC, AACSBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
Weight332 g560 g
Bluetooth5.25.3
Battery life (ANC on)50 h35 h
Driver size40 mm90 mm
Microphones42
Wear detectionYesNo
Driver40 mm dynamic90 mm planar magnetic
Frequency response20 Hz - 20 kHz10 Hz - 50 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Maxwell 2?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Crusher® ANC 2 to Maxwell 2". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.