Is the Audeze Maxwell 2 worth the upgrade from the Skullcandy Crusher® 1080 ANC?
Verdict
Clear upgrade
Going from the Skullcandy Crusher® 1080 ANC to the Audeze Maxwell 2 buys you 10.6 points of HearWiki score - a clear step up that reviewers agree on rather than a marketing refresh. The gains are concentrated in sound (7.6 to 9.5) and calls (8.2 to 9.0). You do give up ground on value (8.5 to 7.5). On paper: battery life 60 h to 80 h and driver size 36 mm to 90 mm. Worth checking: weight goes 374.2 g to 560 g and battery life (anc on) goes 50 h to 35 h. That costs $89 more, or about $8 per point of score - reasonable value for the jump. If your current pair is worn out or the gains line up with how you listen, this one is worth the money.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound7.69.5
- Battery9.59.5
- Calls8.29.0
- Value8.57.5
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | Crusher® 1080 ANC | Maxwell 2 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 60 h | 80 h | |
| Weight | 374.2 g | 560 g | |
| Battery life (ANC on) | 50 h | 35 h | |
| Driver size | 36 mm | 90 mm | |
| Microphones | 6 | 2 | |
| Wear detection | Yes | No | |
| Controls | both | buttons | |
| Driver | 36 mm dynamic | 90 mm planar magnetic | |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz | 10 Hz - 50 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "Crusher® 1080 ANC to Maxwell 2". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.