Is the Skullcandy Crusher® 1080 ANC worth the upgrade from the Sennheiser HD 480 PRO?
Verdict
Downgrade
The Skullcandy Crusher® 1080 ANC actually scores 8.1 points below the Sennheiser HD 480 PRO, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on sound (8.9 to 7.6). On paper it adds active noise cancelling. Worth checking: weight goes 272 g to 374.2 g and driver size goes 38 mm to 36 mm. One caution: this steps down a line tier (HD 480 PRO to Crusher® 1080 ANC), and base models usually trade away tier features - check the codec and ANC rows above before trusting the score gap alone. It is at least $159 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound8.97.6
- Value8.18.5
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | HD 480 PRO | Crusher® 1080 ANC | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes | |
| Weight | 272 g | 374.2 g | |
| Driver size | 38 mm | 36 mm | |
| Driver | 38 mm dynamic | 36 mm dynamic | |
| Frequency response | 3 Hz - 28.7 kHz | 20 Hz - 20 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "HD 480 PRO to Crusher® 1080 ANC". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.

