Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Edifier NeoBuds Pro 3 worth the upgrade from the OPPO Enco Air5 Pro?

You haveOPPO Enco Air5 Pro$6989
-10.9HearWiki points
You're eyeingEdifier NeoBuds Pro 3$14078

Verdict

Downgrade

The Edifier NeoBuds Pro 3 actually scores 10.9 points below the OPPO Enco Air5 Pro, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on battery (9.0 to 7.1) and noise cancelling (9.0 to 8.3). On paper: codecs SBC, AAC, LHDC to SBC, AAC, LHDC, LDAC, full charge time 90 min to 60 min and microphones 3 to 8. Worth checking: battery life goes 13 h to 9 h and bluetooth goes 6.0 to 5.4. And it costs $73 more for a lower score, which is hard to justify on the data alone. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

+$73
Price difference
-10.9
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound8.08.4
  • Noise cancelling9.08.3
  • Battery9.07.1
  • Calls8.08.0
  • Value9.09.0

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the OPPO Enco Air5 Pro and the Edifier NeoBuds Pro 3
SpecEnco Air5 ProNeoBuds Pro 3Direction
Battery life13 h9 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, LHDCSBC, AAC, LHDC, LDAC
Bluetooth6.05.4
Water resistanceIP55IP54
Battery life (ANC on)7 h6 h
Full charge time90 min60 min
Driver size12 mm10 mm
Microphones38
ANC typehybridadaptive
Quick charge10 min → 2 h15 min → 3 h
Driver2× 12 mm driver2-driver hybrid
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the NeoBuds Pro 3?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Enco Air5 Pro to NeoBuds Pro 3". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.