Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Nothing Ear worth the upgrade from the Nothing Ear (a)?

You haveNothing Ear (a)$8078
-6.0HearWiki points
You're eyeingNothing Ear$10972

Verdict

Downgrade

The Nothing Ear actually scores 6.0 points below the Nothing Ear (a), so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on battery (8.5 to 7.5) and calls (8.0 to 7.0). On paper: codecs SBC, AAC, LDAC to SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC 5.0, wireless charging and wear detection. Worth checking: battery life goes 9.5 h to 8.5 h and battery incl. case goes 42.5 h to 40.5 h. And it costs $29 more for a lower score, which is hard to justify on the data alone. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

+$29
Price difference
-6.0
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound8.07.5
  • Noise cancelling7.57.0
  • Battery8.57.5
  • Calls8.07.0
  • Value8.57.5

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Nothing Ear (a) and the Nothing Ear
SpecEar (a)EarDirection
Battery life9.5 h8.5 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, LDACSBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC 5.0
Battery incl. case42.5 h40.5 h
Drivers per side21
Case weight39.6 g51.9 g
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wear detectionNoYes
Quick charge10 min = 10 h (ANC off)10 minutes for 10 hours
Controlstouchbuttons
Frequency response20Hz-20kHz20 Hz - 20,000 Hz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Ear?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Ear (a) to Ear". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.