Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Audio-Technica ATH-S220BT worth the upgrade from the JBL Tour One M3?

You haveJBL Tour One M3$15083
-19.1HearWiki points
You're eyeingAudio-Technica ATH-S220BT$6464

Verdict

Downgrade

The Audio-Technica ATH-S220BT actually scores 19.1 points below the JBL Tour One M3, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on calls (8.1 to 3.3) and value (9.6 to 7.8). On paper: weight 278 g to 180 g and drivers per side 1 to 2. Worth checking: battery life goes 70 h to 60 h and active noise cancelling goes Yes to No. It is at least $86 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

−$86
Price difference
-19.1
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound8.06.8
  • Battery9.69.0
  • Calls8.13.3
  • Value9.67.8

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the JBL Tour One M3 and the Audio-Technica ATH-S220BT
SpecTour One M3ATH-S220BTDirection
Battery life70 h60 h
Active noise cancellingYesNo
CodecsLDACSBC
Weight278 g180 g
Bluetooth5.35.0
Full charge time120 min240 min
Drivers per side12
Microphones81
Driver40 mm dynamic2× 40 mm dynamic
Frequency response10 Hz - 40 kHz5 Hz - 32 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the ATH-S220BT?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Tour One M3 to ATH-S220BT". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.