Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Audeze Maxwell 2 worth the upgrade from the JBL Tour One M3?

You haveJBL Tour One M3$40082
+6.9HearWiki points
You're eyeingAudeze Maxwell 2$33088

Verdict

Meaningful upgrade

The Audeze Maxwell 2 scores 6.9 points above the JBL Tour One M3. That's a real improvement, though not the kind you'd notice on every track. The gains are concentrated in sound (8.0 to 9.5) and calls (8.1 to 9.0). You do give up ground on value (9.6 to 7.5). On paper: battery life 70 h to 80 h, codecs LDAC to SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC and driver size 40 mm to 90 mm. Worth checking: weight goes 278 g to 560 g and battery life (anc on) goes 70 h to 35 h. It's also $71 cheaper, which makes this an easy call. Worth doing if you're replacing anyway; harder to justify as a pure upgrade if what you have still works.

−$71
Price difference
+6.9
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound8.09.5
  • Battery9.69.5
  • Calls8.19.0
  • Value9.67.5

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the JBL Tour One M3 and the Audeze Maxwell 2
SpecTour One M3Maxwell 2Direction
Battery life70 h80 h
CodecsLDACSBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
Weight278 g560 g
Battery life (ANC on)70 h35 h
Driver size40 mm90 mm
Microphones82
Wear detectionYesNo
Controlstouchbuttons
Driver40 mm dynamic90 mm planar magnetic
Frequency response10 Hz - 40 kHz10 Hz - 50 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Maxwell 2?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Tour One M3 to Maxwell 2". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.