Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro worth the upgrade from the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100?

-22.6HearWiki points
You're eyeingSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro$16064

Verdict

Downgrade

The Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro actually scores 22.6 points below the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on battery (8.5 to 4.6) and noise cancelling (7.8 to 6.3). On paper: driver size 10 mm to 11 mm, drivers per side 1 to 2 and wear detection. Worth checking: battery life goes 11 h to 8 h and bluetooth goes 5.4 to 5.0. And it costs $58 more for a lower score, which is hard to justify on the data alone. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

+$58
Price difference
-22.6
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.07.7
  • Noise cancelling7.86.3
  • Battery8.54.6
  • Calls8.06.5

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 and the Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro
SpecMelomania A100Galaxy Buds ProDirection
Battery life11 h8 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDACSBC, AAC, Samsung Scalable
Bluetooth5.45.0
Multipoint pairingYesNo
Water resistanceIPX5IPX7
Battery life (ANC on)6.5 h5 h
Battery incl. case39 h28 h
Driver size10 mm11 mm
Drivers per side12
Microphones63
Case weight38.7 g44.9 g
Wear detectionNoYes
Quick charge10 min → 3.2 h5 min → 1 h
Driver10 mm dynamic2-driver hybrid
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Galaxy Buds Pro?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Melomania A100 to Galaxy Buds Pro". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.