Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Edifier NeoBuds Pro worth the upgrade from the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100?

-17.0HearWiki points
You're eyeingEdifier NeoBuds Pro$14069

Verdict

Downgrade

The Edifier NeoBuds Pro actually scores 17.0 points below the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on value (9.6 to 4.3) and battery (8.5 to 5.4). On paper: drivers per side 1 to 2 and wear detection. Worth checking: battery life goes 11 h to 6 h and bluetooth goes 5.4 to 5.0. And it costs $43 more for a lower score, which is hard to justify on the data alone. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

+$43
Price difference
-17.0
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.07.8
  • Noise cancelling7.86.7
  • Battery8.55.4
  • Calls8.06.8
  • Value9.64.3

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 and the Edifier NeoBuds Pro
SpecMelomania A100NeoBuds ProDirection
Battery life11 h6 h
CodecsSBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDACSBC, LHDC, LDAC
Bluetooth5.45.0
Water resistanceIPX5IP54
Battery life (ANC on)6.5 h5 h
Battery incl. case39 h24 h
Drivers per side12
Case weight38.7 g47 g
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wear detectionNoYes
ANC typeadaptivehybrid
Driver10 mm dynamic2-driver hybrid
Frequency response20 Hz - 20 kHz20 Hz - 40 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the NeoBuds Pro?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Melomania A100 to NeoBuds Pro". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.