Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Beats Powerbeats Pro worth the upgrade from the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100?

-21.5HearWiki points
You're eyeingBeats Powerbeats Pro$25064

Verdict

Downgrade

The Beats Powerbeats Pro actually scores 21.5 points below the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on sound (9.0 to 7.4) and calls (8.0 to 6.8). On paper: driver size 10 mm to 12 mm and wear detection. Worth checking: battery life goes 11 h to 9 h and active noise cancelling goes Yes to No. And it costs $151 more for a lower score, which is hard to justify on the data alone. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

+$150
Price difference
-21.5
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.07.4
  • Battery8.57.5
  • Calls8.06.8

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 and the Beats Powerbeats Pro
SpecMelomania A100Powerbeats ProDirection
Battery life11 h9 h
Active noise cancellingYesNo
CodecsSBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDACSBC, AAC
Weight9.4 g21 g
Bluetooth5.45.0
Multipoint pairingYesNo
Water resistanceIPX5IPX4
Battery incl. case39 h24 h
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Case weight38.7 g80 g
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wear detectionNoYes
USB-CYesNo
Quick charge10 min → 3.2 h5 min → 1.5 h
Controlstouchbuttons
Driver10 mm dynamic12 mm dynamic
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Powerbeats Pro?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Melomania A100 to Powerbeats Pro". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.