Is the Wavefun Wave Pro X worth the upgrade from the Audio-Technica ATH-SR50BT?
Verdict
Clear upgrade
Going from the Audio-Technica ATH-SR50BT to the Wavefun Wave Pro X buys you 30.8 points of HearWiki score - a clear step up that reviewers agree on rather than a marketing refresh. The gains are concentrated in noise cancelling (3.2 to 8.0), battery (5.2 to 9.5) and calls (4.2 to 7.5). On paper: battery life 28 h to 100 h, bluetooth 5.0 to 6.0 and wireless charging. Worth checking: active noise cancelling goes No to No and driver size goes 45 mm to 40 mm. That costs $10 more, or about $0 per point of score - reasonable value for the jump. If your current pair is worn out or the gains line up with how you listen, this one is worth the money.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound7.48.5
- Noise cancelling3.28.0
- Battery5.29.5
- Calls4.27.5
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | ATH-SR50BT | Wave Pro X | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 28 h | 100 h | |
| Active noise cancelling | No | No | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 6.0 | |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm | |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes | |
| Wear detection | No | Yes | |
| USB-C | No | Yes | |
| Driver | 2× 45 mm dynamic | 2× 40 mm dynamic | |
| Frequency response | 5 Hz - 40 kHz | 20 Hz - 20 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "ATH-SR50BT to Wave Pro X". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.

