Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Audio-Technica ATH-SR50BT worth the upgrade from the Audeze Maxwell 2?

You haveAudeze Maxwell 2$33088
-30.4HearWiki points
You're eyeingAudio-Technica ATH-SR50BT$12058

Verdict

Downgrade

The Audio-Technica ATH-SR50BT actually scores 30.4 points below the Audeze Maxwell 2, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on calls (9.0 to 4.2) and battery (9.5 to 5.2). On paper: weight 560 g to 262 g and drivers per side 1 to 2. Worth checking: battery life goes 80 h to 28 h and active noise cancelling goes Yes to No. It is at least $209 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

−$210
Price difference
-30.4
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound9.57.4
  • Battery9.55.2
  • Calls9.04.2

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Audeze Maxwell 2 and the Audio-Technica ATH-SR50BT
SpecMaxwell 2ATH-SR50BTDirection
Battery life80 h28 h
Active noise cancellingYesNo
CodecsSBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDACSBC, AAC, aptX
Weight560 g262 g
Bluetooth5.35.0
Multipoint pairingYesNo
Full charge time120 min330 min
Driver size90 mm45 mm
Drivers per side12
Microphones21
Custom EQYesNo
USB-CYesNo
Driver90 mm planar magnetic2× 45 mm dynamic
Frequency response10 Hz - 50 kHz5 Hz - 40 kHz
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the ATH-SR50BT?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "Maxwell 2 to ATH-SR50BT". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.