Is the Skullcandy Crusher® 1080 ANC worth the upgrade from the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC?
Verdict
Downgrade
The Skullcandy Crusher® 1080 ANC actually scores 9.8 points below the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC, so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. The gains are concentrated in value (6.5 to 8.5) and battery (8.0 to 9.5). You do give up ground on sound (9.3 to 7.6) and calls (9.0 to 8.2). On paper: battery life 40 h to 60 h, weight 560 g to 374.2 g and battery life (anc on) 35 h to 50 h. Worth checking: driver size goes 90 mm to 36 mm. It is at least $189 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound9.37.6
- Noise cancelling8.58.1
- Battery8.09.5
- Calls9.08.2
- Value6.58.5
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | Maxwell 2 ANC | Crusher® 1080 ANC | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 40 h | 60 h | |
| Weight | 560 g | 374.2 g | |
| Battery life (ANC on) | 35 h | 50 h | |
| Driver size | 90 mm | 36 mm | |
| Microphones | 2 | 6 | |
| Wear detection | No | Yes | |
| Driver | 90 mm planar magnetic | 36 mm dynamic | |
| Frequency response | 10 Hz - 50 kHz | 20 Hz - 20 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "Maxwell 2 ANC to Crusher® 1080 ANC". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across over-ear and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.