Is the Technics EAH-AZ100 worth the upgrade from the Powerbeats Pro 2?
Verdict
Meaningful upgrade
The Technics EAH-AZ100 scores 7.4 points above the Powerbeats Pro 2. That's a real improvement, though not the kind you'd notice on every track. The gains are concentrated in sound (7.9 to 9.2) and value (7.0 to 8.1). You do give up ground on calls (8.3 to 7.8). On paper: battery life 10 h to 12 h, codecs AAC to SBC, AAC, LC3, LDAC and multipoint pairing. Worth checking: battery incl. case goes 45 h to 28 h and microphones goes 3 to 2. One caution: this steps down a line tier (Powerbeats Pro 2 to EAH-AZ100), and base models usually trade away tier features - check the codec and ANC rows above before trusting the score gap alone. The two sit at effectively the same price. Worth doing if you're replacing anyway; harder to justify as a pure upgrade if what you have still works.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound7.99.2
- Noise cancelling8.28.6
- Battery8.88.7
- Calls8.37.8
- Value7.08.1
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | Powerbeats Pro 2 | EAH-AZ100 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 10 h | 12 h | |
| Codecs | AAC | SBC, AAC, LC3, LDAC | |
| Multipoint pairing | No | Yes | |
| Battery life (ANC on) | 8 h | 10 h | |
| Battery incl. case | 45 h | 28 h | |
| Microphones | 3 | 2 | |
| Case weight | 69 g | 42 g | |
| ANC type | adaptive | hybrid | |
| Controls | both | touch | |
| Driver | 9.5 mm dynamic | 10 mm dynamic | |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz | 20 Hz - 40 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "Powerbeats Pro 2 to EAH-AZ100". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.

