Is the Sony WF-1000XM6 worth the upgrade from the Beats Powerbeats Pro?
Verdict
Meaningful upgrade
The Sony WF-1000XM6 scores 6.0 points above the Beats Powerbeats Pro. That's a real improvement, though not the kind you'd notice on every track. The gains are concentrated in sound (8.0 to 9.0) and calls (7.5 to 8.0). You do give up ground on battery (9.0 to 8.0). On paper: battery life 9 h to 12 h, active noise cancelling and codecs SBC, AAC to SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3. Worth checking: driver size goes 12 mm to 8.4 mm. One caution: this steps down a line tier (Powerbeats Pro to WF-1000XM6), and base models usually trade away tier features - check the codec and ANC rows above before trusting the score gap alone. That costs $118 more, or about $20 per point of score - reasonable value for the jump. Worth doing if you're replacing anyway; harder to justify as a pure upgrade if what you have still works.
What actually changes
Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.
- Sound8.09.0
- Battery9.08.0
- Calls7.58.0
- Value7.07.0
Spec differences
Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.
| Spec | Powerbeats Pro | WF-1000XM6 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 9 h | 12 h | |
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes | |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
| Multipoint pairing | No | Yes | |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 8.4 mm | |
| Case weight | 80 g | 47 g | |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes | |
| USB-C | No | Yes | |
| Quick charge | 5 min = 1.5 h | 3 min = 1 h | |
| Controls | buttons | touch | |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz | 20 Hz - 40 kHz |
About this verdict
Direction matters here: this page answers "Powerbeats Pro to WF-1000XM6". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.

