Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 worth the upgrade from the Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C)?

-20.1HearWiki points
You're eyeingXiaomi Redmi Buds 3$2063

Verdict

Downgrade

The Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 actually scores 20.1 points below the Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C), so on aggregate review consensus this is a step backwards. It loses ground on sound (8.5 to 5.5) and calls (8.0 to 5.0). On paper: codecs SBC, AAC to SBC, AAC, aptX and driver size 11 mm to 12 mm. Worth checking: battery life goes 6 h to 5 h and active noise cancelling goes Yes to No. One caution: this steps down a line tier (AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) to Redmi Buds 3), and base models usually trade away tier features - check the codec and ANC rows above before trusting the score gap alone. It is at least $105 cheaper, so the lower score comes with a saving. Only worth it if a specific feature above matters more to you than overall quality does.

−$100
Price difference
-20.1
Score change
-
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound8.55.5
  • Battery7.56.5
  • Calls8.05.0
  • Value7.57.0

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) and the Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3
SpecAirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C)Redmi Buds 3Direction
Battery life6 h5 h
Active noise cancellingYesNo
CodecsSBC, AACSBC, AAC, aptX
Bluetooth5.35.2
Driver size11 mm12 mm
Microphones32
Wireless chargingYesNo
Driver11 mm dynamic12 mm dynamic
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Redmi Buds 3?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) to Redmi Buds 3". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.