Skip to content
HearWiki

Is the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 worth the upgrade from the Apple AirPods 3?

You haveApple AirPods 3$8470
+15.6HearWiki points

Verdict

Clear upgrade

Going from the Apple AirPods 3 to the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 buys you 15.6 points of HearWiki score - a clear step up that reviewers agree on rather than a marketing refresh. The gains are concentrated in sound (7.0 to 9.0), calls (6.3 to 8.0) and battery (7.0 to 8.5). On paper: battery life 6 h to 11 h, active noise cancelling and codecs SBC, AAC to SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC. Worth checking: weight goes 4.3 g to 9.4 g and wear detection goes Yes to No. That costs $15 more, or about $1 per point of score - reasonable value for the jump. If your current pair is worn out or the gains line up with how you listen, this one is worth the money.

+$15
Price difference
+15.6
Score change
$1
Cost per point

What actually changes

Sub-scores both products have, on the same 0-10 scale. Bars extend right for a gain, left for a loss.

  • Sound7.09.0
  • Battery7.08.5
  • Calls6.38.0

Spec differences

Only where the two genuinely differ - everything they share is omitted.

Spec differences between the Apple AirPods 3 and the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
SpecAirPods 3Melomania A100Direction
Battery life6 h11 h
Active noise cancellingNoYes
CodecsSBC, AACSBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
Weight4.3 g9.4 g
Bluetooth5.05.4
Multipoint pairingNoYes
Water resistanceIPX4IPX5
Battery incl. case30 h39 h
Microphones36
Transparency modeNoYes
Wear detectionYesNo
USB-CNoYes
ANC typenoneadaptive
Controlsbuttonstouch
Driverdynamic10 mm dynamic
Full side-by-side comparisonWhat beats the Melomania A100?Check another pair

About this verdict

Direction matters here: this page answers "AirPods 3 to Melomania A100". The other direction is a separate question with a different answer. Scores blend published review verdicts across true wireless and shift as new reviews land, so a marginal call today may not be one next quarter.