Name: Campfire Audio Andromeda S
Brand: Campfire Audio
Price: 1099 USD
Rating: 3.6 (3 reviews)

Campfire Audio Andromeda S

A top-to-bottom revision of the Campfire classic, the Andromeda Emerald Sea features updated balanced armatures for a warm analog sound with crisp detail, housed in a re-engineered ergonomic aluminum shell.

W skrócie

Marka: Campfire Audio
Typ: Douszne przewodowe (IEM)
Dopasowanie: -
Łączność: Przewodowe
Redukcja szumów: Nie
Premiera: 2019

Zdaniem HearWikiSkondensowane przez AI(po angielsku)

The Andromeda S is a premium wired in-ear monitor that refines the classic Andromeda formula with a cleaner, more analytical tuning while retaining its multi-driver foundation. It offers exceptional detail retrieval and a vibrant low end, though its upper-midrange can be demanding for some listeners. Its lightweight, well-built shell and detachable cable make it a solid choice for audiophiles seeking a reference-style presentation.

Co działa

Highly resolving and detailed sound
Lightweight and comfortable build
Detachable cable for easy replacement
Strong low-end energy and extension

Co zawodzi

Upper mids can sound harsh or forward
Requires a quality source due to low impedance
Not for listeners preferring a warm or relaxed tuning

Sparafrazowane z opublikowanych recenzji i specyfikacji - to nie jest oryginalny test. .

Specyfikacja

Dźwięk - Campfire Audio Andromeda S
Przetwornik	5 balanced armature drivers
Przetworniki na stronę	5
Pasmo przenoszenia	10Hz-28kHz
Impedancja	6.375 Ω
Skuteczność	112.8 dB/mW

Dźwięk

Dźwięk - Campfire Audio Andromeda S
Przetwornik	5 balanced armature drivers

Co napisali recenzenci(po angielsku)

Źródeł zasilających ocenę tego produktu: 3.

headfonics.com

Headfonics said the Andromeda 2020 kept the core Andromeda design but improved coherence, with a more vibrant low end and smoother mids. The review was clearly favorable overall and recommended the model.

Przeczytaj całą recenzję

whathifi.com

What Hi-Fi found the Andromeda’s build and treble detail impressive, but felt the overall presentation was not cohesive enough and could sound harsh in the upper mids. Their verdict was mixed, with strong marks for features and build but a weak sound score.