Skip to content
HearWiki

STAX SR-009D vs ZMF Atrium: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the STAX SR-009D vs ZMF Atrium, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

STAX SR-009D
Sound9.5
Value5.5
ZMF Atrium

No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.

Specifications

Specification comparison of STAX SR-009D vs ZMF Atrium
SpecSTAX SR-009DZMF Atrium
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$2640$2500
HearWiki score88 / 100 · OutstandingNot scored
Released20242022
Audio
Driverpush-pull electrostatic circular sound elementdynamic
Driver size-50 mm
Drivers per side21
Frequency response5Hz-42kHz10Hz-25kHz
Impedance145000 Ω300 Ω
Sensitivity-96 dB/mW
Wireless
Bluetoothnone-
Multipoint pairingNo-
Battery
Wireless chargingNo-
Features
Active noise cancellingNo-
ANC typenone-
Transparency modeNo-
Companion appNo-
Custom EQNo-
Wear detectionNo-
Design
Weight594 g490 g
USB-CNoNo
Balanced connection-Yes

What reviewers said

STAX SR-009D

The STAX SR-009D is a premium electrostatic over-ear headphone that pushes the boundaries of high-fidelity audio with an exceptionally wide frequency response and transparent, detailed sound. Its open-back design and push-pull driver technology deliver a refined, airy presentation, but it demands a dedicated amplifier and a significant investment. This is a statement piece for audiophiles seeking the utmost in technical performance, not a casual listening device.

  • Pro:Exceptional clarity and detail retrieval
  • Pro:Very wide frequency range (5Hz-42kHz)
  • Pro:Premium build quality with detachable cable
  • Con:Requires specialized electrostatic amplifier
  • Con:Very high price point
  • Con:Open-back design leaks sound and offers no isolation

ZMF Atrium

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.