Skip to content
HearWiki

Sivga Lyrebird vs TRUTHEAR T3: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Sivga Lyrebird comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 82. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Sivga Lyrebird - Great overall at around $164.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Sivga Lyrebird
Sound8.5
Value8.0
TRUTHEAR T3
Sound7.5
Value7.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Sivga Lyrebird vs TRUTHEAR T3
SpecSivga LyrebirdTRUTHEAR T3
TypeWired IEMsWired IEMs
Price (USD)$164$90
HearWiki score82 / 100 · Great72 / 100 · Good
Released20262020
Audio
DriverQuad-Driver Hybrid1DD + 3BA
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Drivers per side4-
Frequency response20Hz-20kHz-
Impedance14 Ω13.8 Ω
Sensitivity108 dB/mW-
Wireless
Multipoint pairingNoNo
Features
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Design
Weight6.5 g-
Detachable cableYes-
USB-CNo-
Model code-PURE

What reviewers said

Sivga Lyrebird

The Sivga Lyrebird is a wired quad-driver hybrid IEM that impresses with its detailed, energetic sound, wide soundstage, and comfortable, well-built design, making it a strong option for audiophiles and gamers alike. However, its 4.4mm balanced connection requires an adapter or dedicated amp for most users, and its tuning may not suit heavier music genres. Despite a few technical caveats, it offers excellent separation, smooth treble, and solid value at its price point.

  • Pro:Excellent sound separation and imaging
  • Pro:Comfortable, premium build quality
  • Pro:Wide soundstage with smooth treble
  • Con:4.4mm balanced plug limits compatibility
  • Con:Needs a capable amp or adapter to sound best
  • Con:Sub-bass depth could be stronger

TRUTHEAR T3

The TRUTHEAR T3 is a warm-leaning hybrid earphone that blends a single dynamic driver with three balanced armatures to deliver a smooth, natural sound signature. It prioritizes tonal richness and relaxed treble over aggressive detail, making it a comfortable, easy-going listen for extended sessions. Its tuning sits as a slightly warmer alternative to neutral competitors, with controlled bass and a lush midrange that appeal to those who value musicality over analytical precision.

  • Pro:Controlled, non-bloated bass response
  • Pro:Lush and natural midrange presentation
  • Pro:Smooth, fatigue-free treble for long listening
  • Con:Treble lacks sharpness and high-energy detail
  • Con:Mixed expert opinions on whether it leans warm or neutral
  • Con:May not satisfy listeners seeking analytical clarity

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.