
Sivga Lyrebird vs TRUTHEAR T3: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the Sivga Lyrebird comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 82. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | Sivga Lyrebird | TRUTHEAR T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wired IEMs | Wired IEMs |
| Price (USD) | $164 | $90 |
| HearWiki score | 82 / 100 · Great | 72 / 100 · Good |
| Released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | Quad-Driver Hybrid | 1DD + 3BA |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers per side | 4 | - |
| Frequency response | 20Hz-20kHz | - |
| Impedance | 14 Ω | 13.8 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 108 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 6.5 g | - |
| Detachable cable | Yes | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
| Model code | - | PURE |
What reviewers said
Sivga Lyrebird
The Sivga Lyrebird is a wired quad-driver hybrid IEM that impresses with its detailed, energetic sound, wide soundstage, and comfortable, well-built design, making it a strong option for audiophiles and gamers alike. However, its 4.4mm balanced connection requires an adapter or dedicated amp for most users, and its tuning may not suit heavier music genres. Despite a few technical caveats, it offers excellent separation, smooth treble, and solid value at its price point.
- Pro:Excellent sound separation and imaging
- Pro:Comfortable, premium build quality
- Pro:Wide soundstage with smooth treble
- Con:4.4mm balanced plug limits compatibility
- Con:Needs a capable amp or adapter to sound best
- Con:Sub-bass depth could be stronger
TRUTHEAR T3
The TRUTHEAR T3 is a warm-leaning hybrid earphone that blends a single dynamic driver with three balanced armatures to deliver a smooth, natural sound signature. It prioritizes tonal richness and relaxed treble over aggressive detail, making it a comfortable, easy-going listen for extended sessions. Its tuning sits as a slightly warmer alternative to neutral competitors, with controlled bass and a lush midrange that appeal to those who value musicality over analytical precision.
- Pro:Controlled, non-bloated bass response
- Pro:Lush and natural midrange presentation
- Pro:Smooth, fatigue-free treble for long listening
- Con:Treble lacks sharpness and high-energy detail
- Con:Mixed expert opinions on whether it leans warm or neutral
- Con:May not satisfy listeners seeking analytical clarity
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
