
Sennheiser HD 800 vs STAX SR-507: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the Sennheiser HD 800 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | Sennheiser HD 800 | STAX SR-507 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $1800 | $1099 |
| HearWiki score | 88 / 100 · Outstanding | 78 / 100 · Great |
| Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | dynamic | Electrostatic |
| Driver size | 56 mm | - |
| Drivers per side | 2 | 2 |
| Frequency response | 14Hz-44.1kHz | 7Hz-41kHz |
| Sound signature | - | Neutral |
| Impedance | 300 Ω | 145000 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB/mW | 118 dB/mW |
| Sensitivity (dB/Vrms) | 102 | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | No | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | - |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 330 g | 533 g |
| Detachable cable | Yes | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
| Balanced connection | Yes | - |
What reviewers said
Sennheiser HD 800
The Sennheiser HD 800 is a premium open-back headphone designed for audiophiles who prioritize an expansive, speaker-like soundstage and exceptional detail retrieval. Its large dynamic drivers and angled transducer placement deliver a wide, airy presentation with precise imaging, though it demands a powerful amplifier to perform at its best. While the price tag is steep, the combination of engineering precision, comfort, and clarity makes it a standout choice for serious listening at home.
- Pro:Exceptional soundstage width and spatial imaging
- Pro:Highly detailed and resolving treble with controlled bass
- Pro:Very comfortable for long listening sessions
- Con:Requires a high-power amplifier; not suitable for portable use
- Con:Fully open design offers no noise isolation
- Con:Expensive retail price
STAX SR-507
The STAX SR-507 is an electrostatic headphone that delivers a highly neutral and transparent sound, prioritizing accuracy and detail over coloration. Its technical performance is outstanding, though it demands a dedicated electrostatic amplifier to unlock its full potential, making it a niche choice for serious audiophiles. The sound is fast and precise, with excellent resolution across the frequency range, though the tuning may come across as slightly lean for some listeners.
- Pro:Exceptional detail retrieval and clarity
- Pro:Fast transient response with electrostatic speed
- Pro:Neutral and accurate tonal balance
- Con:Requires a specialized electrostatic amp, adding cost
- Con:Lean tuning may lack warmth for some
- Con:Heavy build at over half a kilogram
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.