Over-Ear
Philips Fidelio X3
76Great
$140
Full review dataPhilips Fidelio X3 vs Wavefun Wave Pro X: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the Wavefun Wave Pro X comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 89. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Our pick: Wavefun Wave Pro X - Outstanding overall at around $130.
Over-Ear
Wavefun Wave Pro X
89Outstanding
$130
Full review dataScore breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Wavefun Wave Pro X leads on 7 of 7 measures.
- Philips Fidelio X3
- Wavefun Wave Pro X
HearWiki score
76
89
Sound
8.1
8.5
Noise cancelling
-
8.0
Battery
-
9.5
Calls
-
7.5
Value
8.0
9.0
Price (USD)
$140
$130
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Same generation
The Wavefun Wave Pro X is 7 years newer, but it is the same generation of hardware: nothing in the radio, the codecs or the noise cancelling separates them. The platform is level; the newer hardware shows up in convenience features instead - the Wavefun Wave Pro X adds Wireless charging, USB-C, Wear detection and Transparency mode. For 7 years between them, that is a thin return - treat this as a restyle rather than a new platform.
- Fidelio X32019
- Wave Pro X20267 yr newer
What differsFidelio X3Wave Pro X
- Wireless charging
- No
- Yes
- USB-C
- No
- Yes
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Transparency mode
- No
- Yes
Everyday features
Specifications
Fidelio X3Wave Pro X
- Type
- Over-Ear
- Over-Ear
- Price (USD)
- $140
- $130
- HearWiki score
- 76
- 89
- Released
- 2019
- 2026
- Availability
- Still sold new
- Sold new
- Driver
- 50 mm dynamic
- 2× 40 mm dynamic
- Driver type
- dynamic
- dynamic
- Driver size
- 50 mm
- 40 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- 2
- Frequency response
- 5 Hz - 40 kHz
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Impedance
- 30 Ω
- -
- Sensitivity
- 98 dB/mW
- -
- Bluetooth
- -
- 6.0
- Multipoint pairing
- No
- -
- Wireless range
- -
- 10 m
- Battery life
- -
- 100 h
- Battery life (ANC on)
- -
- 60 h
- Wireless charging
- No
- Yes
- Active noise cancelling
- No
- Yes
- ANC type
- none
- -
- Transparency mode
- No
- Yes
- Companion app
- No
- -
- Custom EQ
- No
- -
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Controls
- none
- -
- Voice assistant
- No
- -
- Weight
- 340 g
- -
- Water resistance
- none
- -
- Foldable
- No
- Yes
- Detachable cable
- Yes
- Yes
- USB-C
- No
- Yes
- Pad material
- foam
- -
- Connector
- 3.5 mm
- -
- Balanced connection
- Yes
- -
- Model code
- X3/00
- -
What reviewers said
Philips Fidelio X3
The Philips Fidelio X3 are open-back wired headphones that deliver a neutral, well-balanced sound with standout midrange clarity and an expansive soundstage, making them ideal for critical home listening. Their sturdy, comfortable build and 50mm dynamic drivers support detailed audio across a wide frequency range, though they are best suited for quiet environments due to significant sound leakage and minimal passive isolation. With a 30-ohm impedance and 98 dB sensitivity, they pair easily with most amplifiers, while the lack of wireless features and onboard controls keeps the focus purely on wired performance.
- Pro:Accurate and natural midrange for vocals and instruments
- Pro:Spacious, open soundstage enhances immersion
- Pro:Solid, comfortable build for long sessions
- Con:Open-back design leaks sound and offers poor isolation
- Con:Treble can be uneven, with occasional sibilance
- Con:Bass lacks deep sub-bass impact
Wavefun Wave Pro X
The Wavefun Wave Pro X is a versatile over-ear wireless headphone with a claimed 100-hour battery life (60 with ANC on), Bluetooth 6.0, and a foldable design for portability. It features active noise cancellation, transparency mode, wear detection, and a detachable cable for wired use, making it a strong budget-friendly option for everyday listening.
- Pro:Exceptional 100-hour battery life (60 with ANC)
- Pro:Includes ANC, transparency mode, and wear detection
- Pro:Foldable design with USB-C and wireless charging
- Con:No mention of high-resolution codec support in specs
- Con:Frequency response range is standard, not extended
- Con:Plastic build may feel less premium at this price
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.