Over-Ear
Nectar Hive
85Outstanding
$197
Full review dataNectar Hive vs STAX SR-X3: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Nectar Hive vs STAX SR-X3, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Nectar Hive
Sound9.0
Value7.0
STAX SR-X3
No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.
Specifications
| Spec | Nectar Hive | STAX SR-X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $197 | $150 |
| HearWiki score | 85 / 100 · Outstanding | Not scored |
| Released | 2022 | 1975 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | Electrostatic | electrostatic |
| Drivers per side | - | 1 |
| Frequency response | 20Hz-7kHz | 30-25,000 Hz |
| Sound signature | Bright neutral | - |
| Impedance | - | 130000 Ω |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 370 g | 290 g |
| Model code | - | SR-X Mark 3 |
What reviewers said
Nectar Hive
The Nectar Hive is a wired electrostatic over-ear headphone priced around $600, weighing just 370 grams. It delivers a bright neutral sound signature with a frequency response spanning 20Hz to 7kHz, offering a detailed and airy presentation that leans toward analytical clarity. This model earns high marks for its tonal balance and technical performance, making it a strong contender in its price bracket for listeners who prefer a crisp, revealing sound.
- Pro:Excellent tonal accuracy and neutrality
- Pro:Impressive technical detail retrieval
- Pro:Featherweight design for comfort
- Con:Bright tilt may be fatiguing for some
- Con:Limited bass impact due to electrostatic nature
- Con:Requires dedicated amplifier for proper use
STAX SR-X3
The STAX SR-X3 is a vintage electrostatic headphone from the mid-1970s, offering a transparent, airy, and highly accurate sound signature with minimal coloration. It demands a specialized Stax amplifier or energizer to operate, making it a niche choice for purists seeking pristine detail. Its lightweight build and open-back design deliver an expansive, natural listening experience, though its age and power requirements limit practicality for modern users.
- Pro:Extremely low distortion for a clean, uncolored sound
- Pro:Open, airy presentation with impressive detail retrieval
- Pro:Lightweight design for comfortable extended listening
- Con:Requires a dedicated Stax energizer or amp, adding cost and complexity
- Con:Very high impedance (130k ohms) makes it incompatible with standard gear
- Con:No noise isolation due to open-back design
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.