
JLab Go Pods ANC vs QCY AilyBuds E10 QT35: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the JLab Go Pods ANC comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 82. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
JLab Go Pods ANC leads on 6 of 7 measures.
- JLab Go Pods ANC
- QCY AilyBuds E10 QT35
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
QCY AilyBuds E10 QT35 (2025) against JLab Go Pods ANC (2024). Neither is straightforwardly newer: the JLab Go Pods ANC brings ANC type Hybrid against None, while the QCY AilyBuds E10 QT35 answers with Top codec LDAC against AAC. The JLab Go Pods ANC answers on convenience features: it adds Multipoint pairing, Transparency mode and Water resistance IP55 against IPX4.
- Go Pods ANC2024
- AilyBuds E10 QT3520251 yr newer
- Top codec
- AAC
- LDAC
- ANC type
- Hybrid
- None
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- No
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- No
- Water resistance
- IP55
- IPX4
Platform
Everyday features
Level on: USB-C, Custom EQ, Companion app.
Specifications
- Type
- True Wireless
- True Wireless
- Price (USD)
- $30
- $22
- HearWiki score
- 82
- 68
- Released
- 2024
- 2025
- Availability
- Still sold new
- Sold new
- Driver
- 10 mm dynamic
- 13 mm dynamic
- Driver type
- dynamic
- dynamic
- Driver size
- 10 mm
- 13 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- 1
- Frequency response
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Impedance
- 32 Ω
- -
- Sensitivity
- 99 dB/mW
- -
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC
- LDAC
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- No
- Latency
- 200 ms
- 68 ms
- Wireless range
- 9 m
- 10 m
- Battery life
- -
- 4.5 h
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 5 h
- -
- Battery incl. case
- 26 h
- 27 h
- Full charge time
- 120 min
- 120 min
- Quick charge
- 10 min → 1 h
- 10 min → 2 h
- Wireless charging
- -
- No
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- No
- ANC type
- hybrid
- none
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- No
- Companion app
- Yes
- Yes
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- Yes
- Wear detection
- No
- No
- Controls
- touch
- touch
- Voice assistant
- Yes
- -
- Weight
- 8.4 g
- 4 g
- Case weight
- 27.6 g
- -
- Water resistance
- IP55
- IPX4
- Foldable
- -
- No
- Detachable cable
- No
- No
- USB-C
- Yes
- Yes
- Microphones
- 4
- 4
- Microphone type
- MEMS
- MEMS
- Mic sensitivity
- -38 dBV
- -
- Call noise reduction
- -
- Yes
- Call NR technology
- -
- ENC
What reviewers said
JLab Go Pods ANC
These budget true wireless earbuds deliver a surprisingly robust feature set for the price, including hybrid active noise cancellation, wireless charging, and multipoint connectivity. Sound leans slightly bass-heavy but remains clear and engaging, while the companion app offers a custom EQ to tailor the audio to your liking. They're a strong value pick, though battery life is shorter than some rivals and call quality has some limitations.
- Pro:Excellent value for the price
- Pro:Effective hybrid ANC for the cost
- Pro:Useful app with custom EQ
- Con:Bass-heavy sound may not suit purists
- Con:Battery life is below average for the class
- Con:Call quality is mediocre in noisy settings
QCY AilyBuds E10 QT35
The QCY AilyBuds E10 QT35 are an affordable pair of true wireless earbuds that prioritize sound quality and low-latency performance. They feature 13 mm dynamic drivers with LDAC support for high-resolution audio, along with a compact, lightweight design and IPX4 sweat resistance. With 4.5 hours of playback per charge and a total of 27 hours with the case, they offer decent battery life for budget-focused listeners, but lack active noise cancellation and multipoint connectivity.
- Pro:LDAC support for high-resolution audio
- Pro:Compact and lightweight design (4g per bud)
- Pro:Low latency mode (68ms) for gaming and video
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:No wireless charging or multipoint
- Con:Battery life per charge is modest at 4.5 hours
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
