Skip to content
HearWiki

HiFiMAN Jade II vs Shure Srh1840: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the HiFiMAN Jade II comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 85. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: HiFiMAN Jade II - Outstanding overall at around $690.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

HiFiMAN Jade II
Sound9.0
Value7.0
Shure Srh1840
Sound7.5
Value6.5

Specifications

Specification comparison of HiFiMAN Jade II vs Shure Srh1840
SpecHiFiMAN Jade IIShure Srh1840
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$690$620
HearWiki score85 / 100 · Outstanding72 / 100 · Good
Released20192012
Audio
DriverElectrostaticdynamic
Driver size-40 mm
Drivers per side11
Frequency response7Hz-90kHz10Hz-30kHz
Sound signatureBass-rolled neutral-
Impedance-65 Ω
Sensitivity-96 dB/mW
Wireless
Multipoint pairing-No
Features
Active noise cancelling-No
Design
Weight365 g268 g
Foldable-No
Detachable cable-Yes
USB-C-No
Balanced connection-Yes

What reviewers said

HiFiMAN Jade II

The HiFiMAN Jade II is an over-ear electrostatic headphone that delivers a precise, airy sound with a lean bass response and excellent technical performance. Its ultra-wide frequency range and lightweight build make it a compelling option for listeners who prioritize clarity and detail over bass weight, though it requires a dedicated amplifier setup.

  • Pro:Exceptional clarity and detail retrieval
  • Pro:Very lightweight for an electrostatic model
  • Pro:Wide, airy soundstage with fast transients
  • Con:Bass is noticeably rolled off, lacking impact
  • Con:Requires a specialized electrostatic amp, adding cost
  • Con:Fit and comfort may vary due to thin earpads

Shure Srh1840

The Shure SRH1840 is a lightweight, open-back dynamic headphone aimed at studio professionals, offering a notably flat and detailed sound signature with a wide soundstage. Its build is solid and drivers are well-matched, but it demands quality amplification due to its moderate impedance and lower sensitivity, and some measurements point to distortion issues that may affect critical listening. Overall, it's a capable tool for mixing and monitoring when paired with the right gear, though not ideal for portable use.

  • Pro:Very flat, neutral frequency response
  • Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for long sessions
  • Pro:Expansive soundstage with clear treble
  • Con:Higher harmonic distortion at certain frequencies
  • Con:Less efficient, needs a good amp
  • Con:Not suitable for portable devices

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.