Skip to content
HearWiki

HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2 vs STAX SR-X9000: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2 - Outstanding overall at around $2865.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2
Sound9.5
Value7.0
STAX SR-X9000
Sound9.5
Value5.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2 vs STAX SR-X9000
SpecHiFiMAN HE 1000 V2STAX SR-X9000
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$2865$5050
HearWiki score88 / 100 · Outstanding88 / 100 · Outstanding
Released20162021
Audio
Driverplanarelectrostatic
Driver size131.15 mm-
Drivers per side12
Frequency response8Hz-65kHz5Hz-42,000Hz
Sound signatureNeutral-
Impedance35 Ω145000 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB/mW-
Wireless
Multipoint pairing-No
Features
Active noise cancelling-No
Design
Weight420 g432 g
Balanced connectionYes-

What reviewers said

HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2

The HiFiMAN HE 1000 V2 is a premium planar magnetic headphone offering a neutral, reference-grade sound signature with exceptional clarity and detail. Its large 131mm driver delivers a wide, airy soundstage while maintaining precise imaging, making it a strong choice for critical listening. Despite its high price, it earns top-tier marks for tonal accuracy and technical performance, though it requires a capable amplifier to shine.

  • Pro:Excellent neutral tonality with accurate timbre
  • Pro:Outstanding detail retrieval and resolution
  • Pro:Very wide and open soundstage
  • Con:High price point limits accessibility
  • Con:Low sensitivity (90dB/mW) demands powerful amplification
  • Con:Large ear cups may not suit smaller heads

STAX SR-X9000

The STAX SR-X9000 is a top-tier electrostatic headphone that excels at revealing fine detail, ambient cues, and instrumental nuance, delivering an exceptionally transparent and spacious soundstage. It offers outstanding speed, transient response, and realism, making it ideal for classical and spatially demanding music. However, it requires a dedicated energizer/driver unit, pushing the total system cost far beyond the already steep headphone price.

  • Pro:Exceptional detail retrieval and transparency
  • Pro:Huge, three-dimensional soundstage with precise imaging
  • Pro:Fast transient response and realistic timbre
  • Con:Requires separate electrostatic driver unit
  • Con:Very high total system cost
  • Con:No noise cancellation or wireless convenience

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.