HiFiMAN Arya vs STAX SR-X5: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the HiFiMAN Arya vs STAX SR-X5, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.
Specifications
| Spec | HiFiMAN Arya | STAX SR-X5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $769 | $500 |
| HearWiki score | 88 / 100 · Outstanding | Not scored |
| Released | 2021 | 1976 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | Planar | electrostatic |
| Drivers per side | 1 | - |
| Frequency response | 8Hz-65kHz | - |
| Sound signature | Bright neutral | - |
| Impedance | 35 Ω | - |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB/mW | - |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 430 g | 390 g |
| USB-C | No | - |
| Balanced connection | Yes | - |
| Model code | - | SR-5 |
What reviewers said
HiFiMAN Arya
The HiFiMAN Arya is a premium planar magnetic headphone known for its exceptionally fast, detailed, and airy sound. Its bright-neutral tuning delivers a highly resolving, spacious presentation with excellent technical performance, making it a strong choice for critical listening, though it requires a good amplifier to shine. With a comfortable open-back design and a relatively affordable price for its class, it balances high-end performance with accessibility.
- Pro:Excellent detail retrieval and transparency
- Pro:Wide, open soundstage with precise imaging
- Pro:Fast and articulate planar driver response
- Con:Bright treble can be fatiguing for sensitive ears
- Con:Needs a powerful amp to reach full potential
- Con:Open-back leaks sound and offers little isolation
STAX SR-X5
The STAX SR-X5 is a vintage electrostatic headphone from the late 1970s and 1980s, offering a wide frequency range and high output capability. It demands a dedicated energizer or adapter to function, making it a niche choice for enthusiasts of classic electrostatic sound.
- Pro:Wide frequency response for detailed treble
- Pro:High maximum output level for an older design
- Pro:Classic electrostatic clarity and low distortion
- Con:Requires separate adapter or energizer to operate
- Con:Aging design may have limited parts availability
- Con:Heavier than modern electrostatic models
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.