Skip to content
HearWiki

HiFiMAN Arya vs STAX SR-X5: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the HiFiMAN Arya vs STAX SR-X5, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

HiFiMAN Arya
Sound9.5
Value8.0
STAX SR-X5

No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.

Specifications

Specification comparison of HiFiMAN Arya vs STAX SR-X5
SpecHiFiMAN AryaSTAX SR-X5
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$769$500
HearWiki score88 / 100 · OutstandingNot scored
Released20211976
Audio
DriverPlanarelectrostatic
Drivers per side1-
Frequency response8Hz-65kHz-
Sound signatureBright neutral-
Impedance35 Ω-
Sensitivity90 dB/mW-
Design
Weight430 g390 g
USB-CNo-
Balanced connectionYes-
Model code-SR-5

What reviewers said

HiFiMAN Arya

The HiFiMAN Arya is a premium planar magnetic headphone known for its exceptionally fast, detailed, and airy sound. Its bright-neutral tuning delivers a highly resolving, spacious presentation with excellent technical performance, making it a strong choice for critical listening, though it requires a good amplifier to shine. With a comfortable open-back design and a relatively affordable price for its class, it balances high-end performance with accessibility.

  • Pro:Excellent detail retrieval and transparency
  • Pro:Wide, open soundstage with precise imaging
  • Pro:Fast and articulate planar driver response
  • Con:Bright treble can be fatiguing for sensitive ears
  • Con:Needs a powerful amp to reach full potential
  • Con:Open-back leaks sound and offers little isolation

STAX SR-X5

The STAX SR-X5 is a vintage electrostatic headphone from the late 1970s and 1980s, offering a wide frequency range and high output capability. It demands a dedicated energizer or adapter to function, making it a niche choice for enthusiasts of classic electrostatic sound.

  • Pro:Wide frequency response for detailed treble
  • Pro:High maximum output level for an older design
  • Pro:Classic electrostatic clarity and low distortion
  • Con:Requires separate adapter or energizer to operate
  • Con:Aging design may have limited parts availability
  • Con:Heavier than modern electrostatic models

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.