Skip to content
HearWiki

Hidizs ET01 Sea Anemone vs Tangzu Waner S.G: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Tangzu Waner S.G comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 82. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Tangzu Waner S.G - Outstanding overall at around $19.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Tangzu Waner S.G leads on 4 of 5 measures.

  • Hidizs ET01 Sea Anemone
  • Tangzu Waner S.G
HearWiki score
72
82
Sound
-
8.0
Calls
-
4.5
Value
6.1
9.5
Price (USD)
$19
$19

Specifications

ET01 Sea AnemoneWaner S.G
Type
Wired IEMs
Wired IEMs
Price (USD)
$19
$19
HearWiki score
72
82
Released
2025
2022
Availability
Sold new
Still sold new
Driver
-
10 mm dynamic
Driver type
-
dynamic
Driver size
-
10 mm
Impedance
-
20 Ω
Weight
-
4 g

What reviewers said

Hidizs ET01 Sea Anemone

The Hidizs ET01 Sea Anemone is a budget-friendly wired IEM that prioritizes comfort with its soft, wide-bore silicone eartips. Its sound signature favors bass and midrange clarity, while treble and soundstage are more subdued, making it a solid pick for casual listening at its price point. It is a straightforward, no-frills option for those seeking a comfortable fit and warm presentation on a tight budget.

  • Pro:Comfortable, soft silicone eartips with a wide bore
  • Pro:Good bass and midrange performance for the price
  • Pro:Affordable wired option under $20
  • Con:Treble detail is somewhat modest
  • Con:Soundstage feels limited
  • Con:No included features beyond basic wired connectivity

Tangzu Waner S.G

The Tangzu Waner S.G is a budget-friendly wired IEM with a compact, lightweight build and a 10mm dynamic driver. Its tuning leans warm and smooth, offering a relaxed, music-first sound that punches well above its price point for everyday listening.

  • Pro:Warm, easygoing sound signature
  • Pro:Very lightweight and compact
  • Pro:Detachable 0.78mm two-pin cable
  • Con:No active noise cancellation
  • Con:Lacks water resistance
  • Con:Not for those seeking technical detail

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.