Skip to content
HearWiki

Focal Utopia vs STAX SR-009S: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Focal Utopia comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Focal Utopia - Outstanding overall at around $4999.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Focal Utopia
Sound9.5
Value5.0
STAX SR-009S
Sound9.5
Value6.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Focal Utopia vs STAX SR-009S
SpecFocal UtopiaSTAX SR-009S
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$4999$3290
HearWiki score88 / 100 · Outstanding88 / 100 · Outstanding
Released20222018
Audio
DriverDynamicelectrostatic
Driver size40 mm-
Drivers per side21
Frequency response5Hz-50kHz5Hz-42kHz
Sound signatureNeutral-
Impedance80 Ω145000 Ω
Sensitivity104 dB/mW101 dB/mW
Wireless
Bluetoothnone-
Multipoint pairingNoNo
Features
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Design
Weight490 g589.67 g
Water resistancenone-
Detachable cableYes-
USB-CNo-

What reviewers said

Focal Utopia

The Focal Utopia is a flagship open-back dynamic headphone that delivers exceptionally detailed, neutral sound with very low distortion, thanks to its beryllium driver and precise tuning. It is crafted as a luxury audiophile product with premium materials and a high price tag, making it a top-tier choice for those who prioritize ultimate performance over affordability.

  • Pro:Exceptional resolution and detail retrieval
  • Pro:Very low distortion across frequencies
  • Pro:Natural, accurate timbre and neutral signature
  • Con:Extremely high price point
  • Con:Open-back design offers no isolation
  • Con:Heavy weight may cause fatigue during long sessions

STAX SR-009S

The STAX SR-009S is a premium electrostatic headphone that refines the original SR-009 formula with a slightly smoother, less bright tuning while retaining exceptional speed, detail, and openness. It offers a wide, precisely imaged soundstage and a very comfortable fit, making it a top-tier choice for critical listening, though it demands high-quality recordings and a dedicated amplifier system to shine. Its performance places it among the very best headphones available, with only the newer X9000 potentially edging it out in some respects.

  • Pro:Extremely fast and detailed electrostatic sound
  • Pro:Wide, immersive soundstage with precise imaging
  • Pro:Comfortable fit despite large earcups
  • Con:Very revealing of poor-quality recordings
  • Con:Requires specialized electrostatic amplifier, adding cost and complexity
  • Con:High price point limits accessibility

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.