Skip to content
HearWiki

Earfun Wave Pro X vs Philips Fidelio X2hr: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Earfun Wave Pro X comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 85. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Earfun Wave Pro X - Outstanding overall at around $130.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Earfun Wave Pro X leads on 6 of 7 measures.

  • Earfun Wave Pro X
  • Philips Fidelio X2hr
HearWiki score
85
74
Sound
8.3
7.8
Noise cancelling
7.8
-
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
7.7
-
Value
9.6
7.1
Price (USD)
$130
$110

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Earfun Wave Pro X (2026) against Philips Fidelio X2hr (2017). The Earfun Wave Pro X edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Hybrid against None.

  • Wave Pro X20269 yr newer
  • Fidelio X2hr2017
What differsWave Pro XFidelio X2hr

Platform

ANC type
Hybrid
None

Specifications

Wave Pro XFidelio X2hr
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$130
$110
HearWiki score
85
74
Released
2026
2017
Availability
Sold new
Still sold new
Driver
40 mm dynamic
2× 50 mm dynamic
Driver type
dynamic
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
50 mm
Drivers per side
1
2
Frequency response
20 Hz - 20 kHz
5 Hz - 40 kHz
Impedance
-
30 Ω
Sensitivity
-
100 dB/mW
Bluetooth
6.0
-
Codecs
SBC, aptX, LC3, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
90 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
50 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
hybrid
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
259 g
380 g
Detachable cable
-
Yes
USB-C
Yes
-
Connector
-
3.5 mm
Balanced connection
-
Yes
Model code
-
X2HR/27
Microphones
8
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
noise-cancelling mic
-

What reviewers said

Earfun Wave Pro X

The Earfun Wave Pro X is a budget-friendly over-ear wireless headphone that pairs hybrid active noise cancellation with an impressively long battery life. It supports a wide range of high-quality Bluetooth codecs, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, and offers multipoint connectivity for seamless device switching. With its 40mm dynamic drivers and customizable EQ, it aims to deliver a versatile and immersive listening experience at a competitive price point.

  • Pro:Hybrid ANC effectively reduces ambient noise
  • Pro:Exceptional battery life, especially with ANC off
  • Pro:Supports high-resolution codecs like LDAC and aptX Lossless
  • Con:Plastic build may not feel as premium as pricier rivals
  • Con:Controls are limited to physical buttons
  • Con:Frequency response is somewhat narrow for an over-ear model

Philips Fidelio X2hr

The Philips Fidelio X2HR offers an open-back, wired listening experience with a spacious and natural sound signature, featuring 50mm dynamic drivers and a low 30-ohm impedance that makes them easy to drive from most devices. They deliver strong build quality and plush comfort for long sessions, but their bulky design and less secure fit make them unsuitable for active use. Overall, they represent a compelling value for budget-conscious audiophiles seeking a fun, bass-friendly presentation.

  • Pro:Easy to drive without an external amplifier
  • Pro:Spacious, natural sound with a fun bass tilt
  • Pro:Sturdy build and comfortable ear pads
  • Con:Bulky and heavy for portable or active use
  • Con:Headband may not stay secure during movement
  • Con:Open-back design leaks sound and offers no isolation

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.

Earfun Wave Pro X (85) vs Philips Fidelio X2hr (74): which is better? - HearWiki