Canpur CP622B vs Subtonic STORM: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Canpur CP622B vs Subtonic STORM, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Canpur CP622B leads on 4 of 4 measures.
- Canpur CP622B
- Subtonic STORM
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Canpur CP622B (2023) against Subtonic STORM (2022). These are the same generation of hardware - nothing in the radio, the codecs or the noise cancelling separates them. Nothing separates them on convenience features either, so the choice comes down to tuning and price.
- CP622B20231 yr newer
- STORM2022
Specifications
- Type
- Wired IEMs
- Wired IEMs
- Price (USD)
- $3,500
- $5,200
- HearWiki score
- 74
- Not scored
- Released
- 2023
- 2022
- Availability
- Discontinued
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 6BA + 2EST tribrid
- 5BA + 2EST hybrid
- Driver type
- tribrid
- hybrid
- Driver configuration
- 6BA + 2EST
- 5BA + 2EST
- Drivers per side
- 8
- 7
- Impedance
- 10 Ω
- 6.1 Ω
- Connector
- -
- 2-pin 0.78 mm
What reviewers said
Canpur CP622B
The Canpur CP622B is a premium tribrid IEM that delivers a warm, mid-focused yet balanced sound with impressive technicalities like staging, resolution, and imaging. It offers a natural, engaging tonality with clear vocals and smooth highs, making it an easy and immersive listen for most genres. Its main drawback is the potentially large shell fit, which may not suit all ears.
- Pro:Excellent technical performance with strong staging and imaging
- Pro:Warm, natural tuning with clear, lifelike vocals
- Pro:Smooth yet detailed highs without harshness
- Con:Large shells may cause fit issues for some users
- Con:Low impedance (10 ohms) may require a quality source
- Con:Premium price point limits accessibility
Subtonic STORM
This flagship in-ear monitor aims to deliver a studio-main-monitor-like reference sound, blending two custom low-frequency drivers with five balanced-armature and two electrostatic drivers for a detailed, high-end listening experience. Priced at around $5200, it's a wired, passive design with a 2-pin connector and a low 6.1-ohm impedance, targeting audiophiles seeking a neutral, accurate tuning.
- Pro:Reference-grade neutrality for critical listening
- Pro:Complex hybrid driver setup offers detailed treble and tight bass
- Pro:High-end build and tuning for serious audiophiles
- Con:Very expensive at ~$5200
- Con:Low impedance may require a powerful source
- Con:No noise cancellation or wireless convenience
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
