Skip to content
HearWiki

Campfire Audio Bonneville vs Tangzu Xuan Wu Gate 2: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Campfire Audio Bonneville comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 84. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Campfire Audio Bonneville - Great overall at around $1175.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Campfire Audio Bonneville
Sound8.7
Value7.0
Tangzu Xuan Wu Gate 2
Sound7.5
Value6.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Campfire Audio Bonneville vs Tangzu Xuan Wu Gate 2
SpecCampfire Audio BonnevilleTangzu Xuan Wu Gate 2
TypeWired IEMsWired IEMs
Price (USD)$1175$649
HearWiki score84 / 100 · Great72 / 100 · Good
Released20232024
Audio
Driverhybrid1DD + 4BA + 2EST tribrid
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Drivers per side47
Frequency response5Hz-20kHz7Hz-20kHz
Impedance29 Ω10.5 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB/mW103 dB/mW
Wireless
Multipoint pairing-No
Features
Active noise cancelling-No
Design
Weight9 g-
USB-C-No
Model code-Tangzu Xuanwu Gate

What reviewers said

Campfire Audio Bonneville

The Campfire Audio Bonneville is a premium hybrid in-ear monitor that pairs a 10mm dynamic driver with three balanced armatures to deliver a warm, musical signature with strong bass presence and expansive staging. It offers a comfortable fit and easy power requirements, making it a versatile high-end choice for listeners prioritizing enjoyment over strict neutrality, though its isolation is slightly below par for the category.

  • Pro:Warm, engaging tuning with impactful bass
  • Pro:Comfortable and lightweight fit for long sessions
  • Pro:Easy to drive thanks to low impedance
  • Con:Isolation is weaker than some competing hybrids
  • Con:Tuning favors musicality over neutrality
  • Con:High price point may limit accessibility

Tangzu Xuan Wu Gate 2

This wired tribrid IEM delivers a highly technical and neutral-leaning sound, with standout detail retrieval, spacious staging, and precise imaging that suits analytical listening. However, its stock tuning may come across as bass-light with a sharp treble edge, and it demands a bit of EQ or source matching to tame potential fatigue. Build quality is solid, but the fit can be finicky, and the price tag feels steep relative to its overall package.

  • Pro:Excellent detail retrieval and resolution
  • Pro:Spacious, well-defined soundstage
  • Pro:Accurate imaging for complex tracks
  • Con:Stock tuning can be bass-light and treble-sharp
  • Con:Fit and ergonomics are not ideal
  • Con:Priced high for the performance offered

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.