Skip to content
HearWiki

Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 vs Shure AONIC 215: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 vs Shure AONIC 215, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 leads on 4 of 4 measures.

  • Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020
  • Shure AONIC 215
HearWiki score
86
-
Sound
9.0
-
Value
6.5
-
Price (USD)
$1,400
-

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Same generation

These are the same generation of hardware - nothing in the radio, the codecs or the noise cancelling separates them. Nothing separates them on convenience features either, so the choice comes down to tuning and price.

  • Andromeda 20202020
  • AONIC 215Year unknown

Specifications

Andromeda 2020AONIC 215
Type
Wired IEMs
Wired IEMs
Price (USD)
$1,400
-
HearWiki score
86
Not scored
Released
2020
-
Driver
5× balanced armature
-
Driver type
balanced-armature
-
Drivers per side
5
-
Frequency response
5 Hz - 20 kHz
-
Impedance
6.4 Ω
-
Sensitivity
123 dB/mW
-
Sensitivity (dB/Vrms)
94
-
Active noise cancelling
No
-
Controls
none
-
Detachable cable
Yes
-
USB-C
No
-
Connector
MMCX
3.5 mm
Model code
Andromeda Emerald Sea
-
Microphones
-
1
Microphone type
-
electret

What reviewers said

Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020

The Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 is a premium five-driver balanced armature IEM that refines the original's signature with smoother, more coherent mids and improved treble. It delivers an expansive soundstage with excellent imaging and layering, though its low impedance and high sensitivity mean it demands a quality source to shine. A worthwhile update for both newcomers and existing fans, it excels in clarity and detail but has some limitations in bass texture.

  • Pro:Cohesive and smooth midrange
  • Pro:Excellent soundstage and imaging
  • Pro:Strong, detailed treble
  • Con:Requires a high-quality source
  • Con:Limited bass texture and weight
  • Con:No controls or ANC

Shure AONIC 215

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.