Skip to content
HearWiki

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Moondrop Pudding: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 86. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 - Outstanding overall at around $99.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 leads on 5 of 7 measures.

  • Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
  • Moondrop Pudding
HearWiki score
86
79
Sound
9.0
7.6
Noise cancelling
7.8
5.8
Battery
8.5
8.6
Calls
8.0
6.2
Value
9.6
8.7
Price (USD)
$99
$50

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Mixed generations

Moondrop Pudding (2026) against Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 (2025). Neither is straightforwardly newer: the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 brings Top codec aptX Lossless against LHDC, while the Moondrop Pudding answers with Bluetooth 6.0 against 5.4.

  • Melomania A1002025
  • Pudding20261 yr newer
What differsMelomania A100Pudding

Platform

Bluetooth
5.4
6.0
Top codec
aptX Lossless
LHDC

Everyday features

Wireless charging
Yes
No
Wear detection
No
Yes
Water resistance
IPX5
Not rated

Level on: ANC type, Multipoint pairing, USB-C, Transparency mode, Custom EQ, Companion app.

Specifications

Melomania A100Pudding
Type
True Wireless
True Wireless
Price (USD)
$99
$50
HearWiki score
86
79
Released
2025
2026
Availability
Sold new
Sold new
Driver
10 mm dynamic
10 mm dynamic
Driver type
dynamic
dynamic
Driver size
10 mm
10 mm
Drivers per side
1
1
Frequency response
20 Hz - 20 kHz
-
Impedance
25 Ω
86 Ω
Bluetooth
5.4
6.0
Codecs
SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
SBC, AAC, LHDC
Multipoint pairing
Yes
Yes
Latency
-
60 ms
Wireless range
-
10 m
Battery life
11 h
12.5 h
Battery life (ANC on)
6.5 h
7 h
Battery incl. case
39 h
41 h
Full charge time
66 min
-
Quick charge
10 min → 3.2 h
-
Wireless charging
Yes
No
Active noise cancelling
Yes
Yes
ANC type
adaptive
adaptive
Transparency mode
Yes
Yes
Companion app
Yes
Yes
Custom EQ
Yes
Yes
Wear detection
No
Yes
Controls
touch
touch
Voice assistant
Google Assistant, Siri
-
Weight
9.4 g
-
Case weight
38.7 g
-
Water resistance
IPX5
none
USB-C
Yes
Yes
Pad material
silicone
-
Model code
-
MD-TWS-056
Microphones
6
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-

What reviewers said

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100

The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 are true wireless earbuds that deliver a versatile feature set at a mid-range price. They combine adaptive active noise cancellation with high-resolution wireless audio support, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, along with a comfortable, water-resistant design. With a lengthy total battery life and convenient extras like wireless charging and multipoint, they aim to be a well-rounded daily companion.

  • Pro:Excellent codec support including LDAC and aptX Lossless
  • Pro:Adaptive ANC and transparency mode for flexible listening
  • Pro:Long total battery life with wireless charging case
  • Con:Battery life drops significantly with ANC enabled
  • Con:Touch controls may take time to master
  • Con:No mention of ear tips or fit accessories in specs

Moondrop Pudding

The Moondrop Pudding is a budget-friendly stemless TWS earbud that stands out for its extensive EQ customization and lively default sound, making it a playground for audio tinkerers. While it offers adaptive ANC, multipoint, and a solid battery life, its stiff ear tips, sluggish touch controls, and inconsistent noise cancellation hold it back from being a top all-around pick. It's a niche choice for those wanting deep sound personalization under $50 rather than a flawless everyday performer.

  • Pro:Extensive in-app EQ options for deep sound tailoring
  • Pro:Lively and engaging out-of-box tuning
  • Pro:Strong battery life with case, even with ANC on
  • Con:Stiff ear tips reduce comfort and fit security
  • Con:Touch controls can feel slow or unresponsive
  • Con:ANC performance is inconsistent in real-world use

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.