
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Marshall Minor III: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Marshall Minor III, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 leads on 7 of 7 measures.
- Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
- Marshall Minor III
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 (2025) against Marshall Minor III (2021). The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 is the newer platform here: Bluetooth 5.4 against 5.2, Top codec aptX Lossless against aptX and ANC type Adaptive against None.
- Melomania A10020254 yr newer
- Minor III2021
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.2
- Top codec
- aptX Lossless
- aptX
- ANC type
- Adaptive
- None
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- No
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- No
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- No
- Water resistance
- IPX5
- IPX4
Platform
Everyday features
Level on: Wireless charging, USB-C, Companion app.
Specifications
- Type
- True Wireless
- True Wireless
- Price (USD)
- $99
- $100
- HearWiki score
- 86
- Not scored
- Released
- 2025
- 2021
- Availability
- Sold new
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 10 mm dynamic
- 2× 12 mm dynamic
- Driver type
- dynamic
- dynamic
- Driver size
- 10 mm
- 12 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- 2
- Frequency response
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Impedance
- 25 Ω
- 32 Ω
- Sensitivity
- -
- 93 dB/mW
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.2
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
- SBC, aptX
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- No
- Latency
- -
- 330 ms
- Wireless range
- -
- 10 m
- Battery life
- 11 h
- 5 h
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 6.5 h
- -
- Battery incl. case
- 39 h
- 25 h
- Full charge time
- 66 min
- 90 min
- Quick charge
- 10 min → 3.2 h
- 15 min → 1.5 h
- Wireless charging
- Yes
- Yes
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- No
- ANC type
- adaptive
- none
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- No
- Companion app
- Yes
- Yes
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- No
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Controls
- touch
- touch
- Voice assistant
- Google Assistant, Siri
- No
- Weight
- 9.4 g
- 4 g
- Case weight
- 38.7 g
- 40.2 g
- Water resistance
- IPX5
- IPX4
- USB-C
- Yes
- Yes
- Pad material
- silicone
- -
- Microphones
- 6
- 1
- Call noise reduction
- Yes
- No
What reviewers said
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 are true wireless earbuds that deliver a versatile feature set at a mid-range price. They combine adaptive active noise cancellation with high-resolution wireless audio support, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, along with a comfortable, water-resistant design. With a lengthy total battery life and convenient extras like wireless charging and multipoint, they aim to be a well-rounded daily companion.
- Pro:Excellent codec support including LDAC and aptX Lossless
- Pro:Adaptive ANC and transparency mode for flexible listening
- Pro:Long total battery life with wireless charging case
- Con:Battery life drops significantly with ANC enabled
- Con:Touch controls may take time to master
- Con:No mention of ear tips or fit accessories in specs
Marshall Minor III
The Marshall Minor III are true wireless earbuds that deliver the brand's signature rock-tuned sound through custom 12 mm drivers. They offer a total of 25 hours of playback with the charging case, along with Bluetooth 5.2, IPX4 sweat and water resistance, and wireless charging support. With no ANC or transparency mode, they focus on straightforward, punchy audio in a compact design.
- Pro:Signature Marshall-tuned sound with 12 mm drivers
- Pro:Compact and lightweight at just 4 grams per earbud
- Pro:IPX4 water resistance for workouts and light rain
- Con:No active noise cancellation or transparency mode
- Con:Battery life is modest at 5 hours per charge
- Con:No multipoint connection for seamless device switching
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
