Skip to content
HearWiki

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Marshall Minor Bluetooth: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Marshall Minor Bluetooth, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 leads on 7 of 7 measures.

  • Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
  • Marshall Minor Bluetooth
HearWiki score
86
-
Sound
9.0
-
Noise cancelling
7.8
-
Battery
8.5
-
Calls
8.0
-
Value
9.6
-
Price (USD)
$99
$160

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

New platform

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 (2025) against Marshall Minor Bluetooth (2019). The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 is the newer platform here: Top codec aptX Lossless against AAC and ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Melomania A10020256 yr newer
  • Minor Bluetooth2019
What differsMelomania A100Minor Bluetooth

Platform

Top codec
aptX Lossless
AAC
ANC type
Adaptive
None

Everyday features

Wear detection
No
Yes
Transparency mode
Yes
No
Water resistance
IPX5
IPX4

Level on: Multipoint pairing, Wireless charging, USB-C, Custom EQ, Companion app.

Specifications

Melomania A100Minor Bluetooth
Type
True Wireless
True Wireless
Price (USD)
$99
$160
HearWiki score
86
Not scored
Released
2025
2019
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
10 mm dynamic
2× 12 mm dynamic
Driver type
dynamic
dynamic
Driver size
10 mm
12 mm
Drivers per side
1
2
Frequency response
20 Hz - 20 kHz
20 Hz - 20 kHz
Impedance
25 Ω
32 Ω
Sensitivity
-
110 dB/mW
Bluetooth
5.4
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
SBC, AAC
Multipoint pairing
Yes
Yes
Wireless range
-
10 m
Battery life
11 h
7 h
Battery life (ANC on)
6.5 h
-
Battery incl. case
39 h
30 h
Full charge time
66 min
66 min
Quick charge
10 min → 3.2 h
15 min → 3 h
Wireless charging
Yes
Yes
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
none
Transparency mode
Yes
No
Companion app
Yes
Yes
Custom EQ
Yes
Yes
Wear detection
No
Yes
Controls
touch
touch
Voice assistant
Google Assistant, Siri
No
Weight
9.4 g
7.4 g
Case weight
38.7 g
-
Water resistance
IPX5
IPX4
Foldable
-
No
USB-C
Yes
Yes
Pad material
silicone
-
Model code
-
MINOR IV
Microphones
6
1
Microphone type
-
MEMS
Call noise reduction
Yes
No

What reviewers said

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100

The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 are true wireless earbuds that deliver a versatile feature set at a mid-range price. They combine adaptive active noise cancellation with high-resolution wireless audio support, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, along with a comfortable, water-resistant design. With a lengthy total battery life and convenient extras like wireless charging and multipoint, they aim to be a well-rounded daily companion.

  • Pro:Excellent codec support including LDAC and aptX Lossless
  • Pro:Adaptive ANC and transparency mode for flexible listening
  • Pro:Long total battery life with wireless charging case
  • Con:Battery life drops significantly with ANC enabled
  • Con:Touch controls may take time to master
  • Con:No mention of ear tips or fit accessories in specs

Marshall Minor Bluetooth

The Marshall Minor Bluetooth earbuds deliver a signature Marshall sound in a true wireless design, with up to 30 hours of total battery life when including the charging case. They feature a water-resistant build, custom EQ via the companion app, and support for multipoint connectivity, making them a versatile option for everyday listening without active noise cancellation.

  • Pro:Distinctive Marshall-tuned audio with a lively, dynamic character
  • Pro:Long combined battery life of 30 hours with the case
  • Pro:IPX4 water resistance for sweat and light rain protection
  • Con:No active noise cancellation, so background noise remains audible
  • Con:Only single microphone per earbud may limit call clarity in noisy settings
  • Con:Touch controls can be finicky and lack physical button feedback

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.