
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Marshall Minor Bluetooth: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs Marshall Minor Bluetooth, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 leads on 7 of 7 measures.
- Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
- Marshall Minor Bluetooth
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 (2025) against Marshall Minor Bluetooth (2019). The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 is the newer platform here: Top codec aptX Lossless against AAC and ANC type Adaptive against None.
- Melomania A10020256 yr newer
- Minor Bluetooth2019
- Top codec
- aptX Lossless
- AAC
- ANC type
- Adaptive
- None
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- No
- Water resistance
- IPX5
- IPX4
Platform
Everyday features
Level on: Multipoint pairing, Wireless charging, USB-C, Custom EQ, Companion app.
Specifications
- Type
- True Wireless
- True Wireless
- Price (USD)
- $99
- $160
- HearWiki score
- 86
- Not scored
- Released
- 2025
- 2019
- Availability
- Sold new
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 10 mm dynamic
- 2× 12 mm dynamic
- Driver type
- dynamic
- dynamic
- Driver size
- 10 mm
- 12 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- 2
- Frequency response
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Impedance
- 25 Ω
- 32 Ω
- Sensitivity
- -
- 110 dB/mW
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
- SBC, AAC
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- Yes
- Wireless range
- -
- 10 m
- Battery life
- 11 h
- 7 h
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 6.5 h
- -
- Battery incl. case
- 39 h
- 30 h
- Full charge time
- 66 min
- 66 min
- Quick charge
- 10 min → 3.2 h
- 15 min → 3 h
- Wireless charging
- Yes
- Yes
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- No
- ANC type
- adaptive
- none
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- No
- Companion app
- Yes
- Yes
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- Yes
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Controls
- touch
- touch
- Voice assistant
- Google Assistant, Siri
- No
- Weight
- 9.4 g
- 7.4 g
- Case weight
- 38.7 g
- -
- Water resistance
- IPX5
- IPX4
- Foldable
- -
- No
- USB-C
- Yes
- Yes
- Pad material
- silicone
- -
- Model code
- -
- MINOR IV
- Microphones
- 6
- 1
- Microphone type
- -
- MEMS
- Call noise reduction
- Yes
- No
What reviewers said
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 are true wireless earbuds that deliver a versatile feature set at a mid-range price. They combine adaptive active noise cancellation with high-resolution wireless audio support, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, along with a comfortable, water-resistant design. With a lengthy total battery life and convenient extras like wireless charging and multipoint, they aim to be a well-rounded daily companion.
- Pro:Excellent codec support including LDAC and aptX Lossless
- Pro:Adaptive ANC and transparency mode for flexible listening
- Pro:Long total battery life with wireless charging case
- Con:Battery life drops significantly with ANC enabled
- Con:Touch controls may take time to master
- Con:No mention of ear tips or fit accessories in specs
Marshall Minor Bluetooth
The Marshall Minor Bluetooth earbuds deliver a signature Marshall sound in a true wireless design, with up to 30 hours of total battery life when including the charging case. They feature a water-resistant build, custom EQ via the companion app, and support for multipoint connectivity, making them a versatile option for everyday listening without active noise cancellation.
- Pro:Distinctive Marshall-tuned audio with a lively, dynamic character
- Pro:Long combined battery life of 30 hours with the case
- Pro:IPX4 water resistance for sweat and light rain protection
- Con:No active noise cancellation, so background noise remains audible
- Con:Only single microphone per earbud may limit call clarity in noisy settings
- Con:Touch controls can be finicky and lack physical button feedback
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
