Skip to content
HearWiki

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 vs EarFun Free Pro 3: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 86. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 - Outstanding overall at around $99.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 leads on 7 of 7 measures.

  • Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
  • EarFun Free Pro 3
HearWiki score
86
71
Sound
9.0
7.1
Noise cancelling
7.8
6.0
Battery
8.5
5.5
Calls
8.0
6.2
Value
9.6
5.6
Price (USD)
$99
$120

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

New platform

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 (2025) against EarFun Free Pro 3 (2023). The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 is the newer platform here: Bluetooth 5.4 against 5.3, Top codec aptX Lossless against aptX Adaptive and ANC type Adaptive against Hybrid.

  • Melomania A10020252 yr newer
  • Free Pro 32023
What differsMelomania A100Free Pro 3

Platform

Bluetooth
5.4
5.3
Top codec
aptX Lossless
aptX Adaptive
ANC type
Adaptive
Hybrid

Level on: Multipoint pairing, Wireless charging, USB-C, Transparency mode, Custom EQ, Companion app, Water resistance.

Specifications

Melomania A100Free Pro 3
Type
True Wireless
True Wireless
Price (USD)
$99
$120
HearWiki score
86
71
Released
2025
2023
Availability
Sold new
Still sold new
Driver
10 mm dynamic
2× 7 mm dynamic
Driver type
dynamic
dynamic
Driver size
10 mm
7 mm
Drivers per side
1
2
Frequency response
20 Hz - 20 kHz
20 Hz - 40 kHz
Impedance
25 Ω
16 Ω
Sensitivity
-
100 dB/mW
Bluetooth
5.4
5.3
Codecs
SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC
SBC, aptX Adaptive
Multipoint pairing
Yes
Yes
Latency
-
55 ms
Wireless range
-
15 m
Battery life
11 h
7.5 h
Battery life (ANC on)
6.5 h
6 h
Battery incl. case
39 h
33 h
Full charge time
66 min
90 min
Quick charge
10 min → 3.2 h
10 min → 2 h
Wireless charging
Yes
Yes
Active noise cancelling
Yes
Yes
ANC type
adaptive
hybrid
Transparency mode
Yes
Yes
Companion app
Yes
Yes
Custom EQ
Yes
Yes
Wear detection
No
No
Controls
touch
touch
Voice assistant
Google Assistant, Siri
Yes
Weight
9.4 g
41.5 g
Case weight
38.7 g
41.5 g
Water resistance
IPX5
IPX5
USB-C
Yes
Yes
Pad material
silicone
-
Microphones
6
6
Microphone type
-
MEMS
Call noise reduction
Yes
Yes
Call NR technology
-
cVc 8.0

What reviewers said

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100

The Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 are true wireless earbuds that deliver a versatile feature set at a mid-range price. They combine adaptive active noise cancellation with high-resolution wireless audio support, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, along with a comfortable, water-resistant design. With a lengthy total battery life and convenient extras like wireless charging and multipoint, they aim to be a well-rounded daily companion.

  • Pro:Excellent codec support including LDAC and aptX Lossless
  • Pro:Adaptive ANC and transparency mode for flexible listening
  • Pro:Long total battery life with wireless charging case
  • Con:Battery life drops significantly with ANC enabled
  • Con:Touch controls may take time to master
  • Con:No mention of ear tips or fit accessories in specs

EarFun Free Pro 3

The EarFun Free Pro 3 are compact true wireless earbuds that deliver a robust feature set for their price, including hybrid ANC, aptX Adaptive support, wireless charging, and multipoint connectivity. They offer strong, well-rounded audio performance and solid battery life, though real-world endurance may be slightly less than advertised and call quality is merely average. Comfort is decent but not the best in EarFun's lineup, making them a versatile choice for Android users seeking value.

  • Pro:Strong audio with aptX Adaptive support
  • Pro:Hybrid ANC and transparency mode included
  • Pro:Wireless charging and multipoint connectivity
  • Con:Battery life falls short of official claims
  • Con:Call quality is only average
  • Con:Comfort not as good as some rivals

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.