
Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Nectar Hive: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the Nectar Hive comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 85. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | Beyerdynamic DT 1350 | Nectar Hive |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $276 | $197 |
| HearWiki score | 82 / 100 · Great | 85 / 100 · Outstanding |
| Released | 2012 | 2022 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | Tesla technology | Electrostatic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | - |
| Drivers per side | 2 | - |
| Frequency response | 5Hz-30kHz | 20Hz-7kHz |
| Sound signature | - | Bright neutral |
| Impedance | 80 Ω | - |
| Sensitivity | 109 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | No | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | - |
| Controls | none | - |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 370 g |
| Foldable | Yes | - |
| Detachable cable | Yes | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
What reviewers said
Beyerdynamic DT 1350
The Beyerdynamic DT 1350 is a compact, closed-back on-ear headphone that blends studio-grade monitoring with portable convenience. Its Tesla driver technology delivers punchy bass, clear mids, and crisp highs, while the sturdy build and effective passive isolation make it a strong contender for critical listening on the go. Though priced higher than many portables, its performance justifies the cost for those seeking a serious, wired option.
- Pro:Powerful, detailed sound with deep bass
- Pro:Excellent passive noise isolation
- Pro:Sturdy, foldable build for travel
- Con:Clamping force can be tight for some
- Con:On-ear design may feel small for larger ears
- Con:No inline controls or microphone
Nectar Hive
The Nectar Hive is a wired electrostatic over-ear headphone priced around $600, weighing just 370 grams. It delivers a bright neutral sound signature with a frequency response spanning 20Hz to 7kHz, offering a detailed and airy presentation that leans toward analytical clarity. This model earns high marks for its tonal balance and technical performance, making it a strong contender in its price bracket for listeners who prefer a crisp, revealing sound.
- Pro:Excellent tonal accuracy and neutrality
- Pro:Impressive technical detail retrieval
- Pro:Featherweight design for comfort
- Con:Bright tilt may be fatiguing for some
- Con:Limited bass impact due to electrostatic nature
- Con:Requires dedicated amplifier for proper use
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.