Skip to content
HearWiki

Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Technics EAH-AZ100: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Technics EAH-AZ100 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 86. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Technics EAH-AZ100 - Outstanding overall at around $250.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Technics EAH-AZ100 leads on 4 of 7 measures.

  • Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
  • Technics EAH-AZ100
HearWiki score
78
86
Sound
7.8
9.2
Noise cancelling
7.8
8.6
Battery
8.3
8.7
Calls
8.1
7.8
Value
8.5
8.1
Price (USD)
$150
$250

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Technics EAH-AZ100 (2025) against Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 (2024). The Technics EAH-AZ100 edges ahead on platform, but only just: LE Audio (LC3). The Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 answers on convenience features: it adds Water resistance IP54 against IPX4.

  • AMIRON 3002024
  • EAH-AZ10020251 yr newer
What differsAMIRON 300EAH-AZ100

Platform

LE Audio (LC3)
No
Yes

Everyday features

Water resistance
IP54
IPX4

Level on: Bluetooth, Top codec, ANC type, Multipoint pairing, Wireless charging, USB-C, Wear detection, Transparency mode, Custom EQ, Companion app.

Specifications

AMIRON 300EAH-AZ100
Type
True Wireless
True Wireless
Price (USD)
$150
$250
HearWiki score
78
86
Released
2024
2025
Availability
Still sold new
Sold new
Driver
2× 10 mm driver
10 mm dynamic
Driver type
-
dynamic
Driver size
10 mm
10 mm
Drivers per side
2
1
Frequency response
20 Hz - 40 kHz
20 Hz - 40 kHz
Impedance
32 Ω
16 Ω
Sensitivity
95 dB/mW
-
Bluetooth
5.3
5.3
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LDAC
SBC, AAC, LC3, LDAC
Multipoint pairing
Yes
Yes
Wireless range
-
10 m
Battery life
10 h
12 h
Battery life (ANC on)
7 h
10 h
Battery incl. case
38 h
28 h
Full charge time
120 min
120 min
Quick charge
-
15 min → 1.2 h
Wireless charging
Yes
Yes
Active noise cancelling
Yes
Yes
ANC type
hybrid
hybrid
Transparency mode
Yes
Yes
Companion app
Yes
Yes
Custom EQ
Yes
Yes
Wear detection
Yes
Yes
Controls
touch
touch
Voice assistant
Yes
Yes
Weight
4.4 g
11.8 g
Case weight
51.3 g
42 g
Water resistance
IP54
IPX4
USB-C
Yes
Yes
Microphones
6
2
Microphone type
-
MEMS
Call noise reduction
Yes
-

What reviewers said

Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300

The Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 true wireless earbuds deliver a comfortable, premium listening experience with strong battery life and modern connectivity, including LDAC and multipoint support. While they don't break new ground in features, they perform solidly for everyday use, with hybrid ANC, wireless charging, and an IP54 rating adding practical value. The main trade-off is a higher price point that may not fully justify the overall sound quality or stability of multi-device connections.

  • Pro:Excellent battery life, with up to 10 hours per charge and 38 hours with the case
  • Pro:Supports high-resolution LDAC audio alongside SBC and AAC codecs
  • Pro:Hybrid active noise cancellation and transparency mode for versatile listening
  • Con:Multipoint connection stability can be inconsistent during dual-device use
  • Con:Sound quality may not meet expectations at the premium price point
  • Con:Feature set feels standard rather than innovative for the cost

Technics EAH-AZ100

The Technics EAH-AZ100 are premium true wireless earbuds that deliver rich, detailed sound through a 10mm dynamic driver, with support for high-resolution LDAC streaming. They combine effective hybrid active noise cancellation with a comfortable, IPX4-rated design, plus smart features like multipoint pairing and wireless charging for versatile daily use. With up to 12 hours of playtime on a single charge, they are built to last through long listening sessions.

  • Pro:Excellent sound quality with LDAC support
  • Pro:Strong hybrid ANC and transparency modes
  • Pro:Long battery life with wireless charging case
  • Con:Premium price point
  • Con:Touch controls may be overly sensitive
  • Con:No aptX codec support

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.