Open-Ear
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
82Outstanding
$180
Full review dataBeyerdynamic Amiron 200 vs Bose Ultra Open Earbuds: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 vs Bose Ultra Open Earbuds, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 leads on 6 of 6 measures.
- Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
- Bose Ultra Open Earbuds
HearWiki score
82
-
Sound
8.7
-
Battery
8.9
-
Calls
7.4
-
Value
7.6
-
Price (USD)
$180
$200
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Same generation
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 (2025) against Bose Ultra Open Earbuds (2024). These are the same generation of hardware - nothing in the radio, the codecs or the noise cancelling separates them.
- Amiron 20020251 yr newer
- Ultra Open Earbuds2024
What differsAmiron 200Ultra Open Earbuds
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Transparency mode
- No
- Yes
- Water resistance
- IP54
- IPX4
Everyday features
Level on: Top codec, Multipoint pairing, USB-C, Companion app.
Specifications
Amiron 200Ultra Open Earbuds
- Type
- Open-Ear
- Open-Ear
- Price (USD)
- $180
- $200
- HearWiki score
- 82
- Not scored
- Released
- 2025
- 2024
- Availability
- Sold new
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 18 mm dynamic
- 2× dynamic
- Driver type
- dynamic
- dynamic
- Driver size
- 18 mm
- -
- Drivers per side
- 1
- 2
- Frequency response
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Sound signature
- -
- neutral
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC
- SBC, AAC
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- Yes
- Wireless range
- 15 m
- -
- Battery life
- 11 h
- 7 h
- Battery incl. case
- 36 h
- 19.5 h
- Full charge time
- 120 min
- 60 min
- Quick charge
- 5 min → 1.5 h
- 10 min → 2 h
- Wireless charging
- Yes
- -
- Active noise cancelling
- No
- No
- ANC type
- none
- none
- Transparency mode
- No
- Yes
- Companion app
- Yes
- Yes
- Custom EQ
- -
- Yes
- Wear detection
- No
- Yes
- Controls
- touch
- buttons
- Voice assistant
- -
- Yes
- Weight
- -
- 6.3 g
- Case weight
- 76 g
- 44 g
- Water resistance
- IP54
- IPX4
- USB-C
- Yes
- Yes
- Model code
- -
- ULT-HEADPHONEOPN
- Microphones
- 4
- 2
- Microphone type
- -
- MEMS
What reviewers said
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 are open-ear wireless earbuds that deliver competitive sound quality with robust EQ customization via the companion app. They offer a secure fit, long battery life, and practical features like Bluetooth 5.3, multipoint, and IP54 water resistance, making them suitable for workouts and daily office use. While technically strong, their price-performance ratio is only acceptable rather than exceptional.
- Pro:Strong, competitive sound quality
- Pro:Secure and comfortable fit for daily use
- Pro:Long battery life (11 hours per charge, 36 with case)
- Con:No wear detection sensor
- Con:Touch controls can be overly sensitive
- Con:Price-performance ratio is only acceptable
Bose Ultra Open Earbuds
These open-ear earbuds use a cuff-style design to deliver personal audio while keeping your ears fully exposed to your surroundings. With a comfortable, secure fit and solid battery life, they're built for all-day wear and easy connectivity. The sound is surprisingly full for an open design, and the IPX4 rating adds peace of mind for workouts or light rain.
- Pro:Cuff-style design keeps ears open for situational awareness
- Pro:Comfortable and secure fit for extended wear
- Pro:Rich, private sound from a compact open-ear form
- Con:No active noise cancellation, so ambient sounds remain audible
- Con:Battery life is modest at 7 hours per charge
- Con:SBC and AAC only—no support for higher-quality codecs
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.