Skip to content
HearWiki

Aukey EP-B52 vs HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Aukey EP-B52 vs HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Aukey EP-B52

No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.

HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020
Sound8.5
Value9.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Aukey EP-B52 vs HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020
SpecAukey EP-B52HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$90$169
HearWiki scoreNot scored82 / 100 · Great
Released20172020
Audio
Driverdynamicplanar
Driver size40 mm70 mm
Drivers per side21
Frequency response20Hz-20kHz20Hz-35kHz
Impedance32 Ω35 Ω
Sensitivity117 dB/mW93 dB/mW
Wireless
Bluetooth5.0-
CodecsAAC, SBC-
Multipoint pairingNoNo
Wireless range10 m-
Battery
Battery life25 h-
Full charge time150 min-
Features
Active noise cancelling-No
Controls-none
Design
Weight220 g370 g
Detachable cableYesYes
USB-CNoNo
Balanced connection-Yes

What reviewers said

Aukey EP-B52

The Aukey EP-B52 is a budget-friendly wireless over-ear headphone from 2017, offering a solid 25-hour battery life and Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity for reliable daily use. It features 40mm dynamic drivers and supports AAC and SBC codecs, though it lacks multipoint pairing and USB-C charging. With a lightweight 220g build and a detachable cable, it's a practical choice for casual listening, but its dated design and limited codec support may not satisfy audiophiles.

  • Pro:Long 25-hour battery life
  • Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for extended wear
  • Pro:Bluetooth 5.0 for stable wireless connection
  • Con:No multipoint pairing for easy device switching
  • Con:Lacks USB-C charging, uses older port
  • Con:Only supports AAC and SBC codecs, not aptX

HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020

The HiFiMAN HE 400i Ver.2020 is an open-back planar headphone that delivers impressive clarity and speed for its budget-friendly price. While its neutral tuning may benefit from EQ for some listeners, it offers solid comfort and strong overall value in the sub-$200 range. Its main limitations include lighter bass response and an open design that lacks isolation.

  • Pro:Fast, resolving planar sound with good detail
  • Pro:Comfortable fit for extended listening sessions
  • Pro:Excellent value for the price
  • Con:Tuning can sound sharp on bright tracks
  • Con:Bass is lighter compared to some rivals
  • Con:No carrying case included

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.