Skip to content
HearWiki

Audio-Technica W2022 vs Focal Utopia: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audio-Technica W2022 vs Focal Utopia, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audio-Technica W2022

No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.

Focal Utopia
Sound9.5
Value5.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Audio-Technica W2022 vs Focal Utopia
SpecAudio-Technica W2022Focal Utopia
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$9000$4999
HearWiki scoreNot scored88 / 100 · Outstanding
Released20222022
Audio
DriverdynamicDynamic
Driver size58 mm40 mm
Drivers per side22
Frequency response5Hz-50kHz5Hz-50kHz
Sound signature-Neutral
Impedance48 Ω80 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB/mW104 dB/mW
Wireless
Bluetooth-none
Multipoint pairing-No
Features
Active noise cancelling-No
Design
Weight450 g490 g
Water resistance-none
Detachable cable-Yes
USB-CNoNo
Balanced connectionYes-

What reviewers said

Audio-Technica W2022

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Focal Utopia

The Focal Utopia is a flagship open-back dynamic headphone that delivers exceptionally detailed, neutral sound with very low distortion, thanks to its beryllium driver and precise tuning. It is crafted as a luxury audiophile product with premium materials and a high price tag, making it a top-tier choice for those who prioritize ultimate performance over affordability.

  • Pro:Exceptional resolution and detail retrieval
  • Pro:Very low distortion across frequencies
  • Pro:Natural, accurate timbre and neutral signature
  • Con:Extremely high price point
  • Con:Open-back design offers no isolation
  • Con:Heavy weight may cause fatigue during long sessions

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.